4. Don't create `relation` based on Wikipedia articles and lists osm.wiki/Relations_are_not_categories

3. This seems to be a `network=` , not a `=route`

1. Please don't add Something "In" Something as the `name=` , which is obviously not a proper name

`not:*=` is for OSM editing only.

@vectorial8192 That's `=designated`

Thank you for correcting `lanes=2` , but please don't remove `passing_places=yes` when adding `lanes=1`

This is not a net improvement, as `name:en=` is wrongly changed, breaking any application using it for English names to find and show bus stops. Presumably no apps are able to relate the `=bus_station` with `=bus_stop` directly and visibly.
If you know this is bad, you should use "Notes". And at least `description=` can be used, which is surely supported.

I don't know what you are doing. But you should multi-select by holding [Shift] as usual.

Please don't blindly merge different road sections. They are split to show different attributes.

2. As I said, whether this has been an estate would be covered by `abandoned:landuse=residential`

2. Eg if Wang Chi House returns, but the Court voted to rebuild, it's still `=residential` until they move out

1. The structure is independent of the use. If there's no one living there , it's not `=residential` now. Unless you are arguing it's a short-term closure.
2. `landuse=` is describing use, and OSM is about the existing reality. Legal status and plans don't affect that.

That has the entire road blocked, and physically. You said there are sidewalks available here.

Please don't remove `is_in:suburb=` here. Only unstructured `is_in=` is deprecated, not `is_in:*=` structured. There's no `boundary=administrative` to replace it.

Some applications may not process `footway=sidewalk` in a simplified view. Snapping may snap to the roadway, causing them not to be used.

Please don't change `name:zh=` to `name:yue-Hant=` , as the label of "Mandarin Chinese" is simply wrong or misapplied by default. It means unspecified Sinitic langauges.

A congested or crowded road doesn't mean you are not allowed to walk on it. The presence of `footway=sidewalk` doesn't determine what its `highway=` road should be, which can be `=use_sidepath` if pedestrian are legally prohibited from the roadway.

1. What do you mean by there's "no actual changes to the estate itself"? `landuse=` is about the use. The use has changed from being uninhabited to inhabited.
2. That's untrue. Abandonment without demolition is still `=brownfield` , as with many such polluted industries in reality in the common language.
3. I don't see what's "painfully obvious". This can be described by `abandoned:landuse=residential` , and there are still `building=apartments` inside.

`access=` is interpreted for all modes. Can pedestrians walk there?

OSM is about the existing reality, and `landuse=` the existing use. `=brownfield` means it's not inhabited.