Ist die B65 hier nicht eine autobahnähnliche Straße?

Jetzt sehe ich auch, dass ich einen zu langen Teil als "no" gezeichnet habe, das war definitiv mein Fehler
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129128130

@Langlaeufer, Danke für die Korrektur!
Ich dachte (zumindest stand es so in meinem OSMTracker, als ich dorthin fuhr), dass es einen Radweg (DE:237,1000-33) Rudolf-von-Bennigsen-Ufer entlang gibt => "use_sidepath" ist erforderlich, oder?
Das gleiche gilt für die Schützenallee - DE:241 auf der einen und diese Velouroute 8 auf der anderen Seite. Wahrscheinlich habe ich etwas falsch verstanden, also danke nochmals für die Korrektur.

(comments in JOSM are too short)

...so if one wants to give a hint to employees, which roads are bike-rideable or foot-accessible, it should be also covered by "bicycle/foot=private", not "bicycle/foot=yes". Otherwise route-planners will show these ways as possible for strangers and this is not how it should be.

For additional info see comment to my Changeset: 113326961 (I described procedure there). I hope that fellow mappers will check the comment first, before they decide to move objects to non-offset maps...

Here I want to add that I made a new offset in the region of Wasbüttel only for the Mapbox satellite map, as there is already existed good offset for Bing (named "Isenbüttel"). I also want to emphasize that new offset for Mapbox and existed for Bing matched very well (positions of the roads, streets and other objects are almost the same) and it gave me some additional confidence for fürther map improvement

Additional info. Imagery offsets for Bing aerial and Mapbox satellite maps were made on the basis of own GPS-tracking: two devices recorded tracks simultaneously, accuracy was ca.1-3 meters (I made it on bicycle). To be sure that this data is good enough, I also checked map in the area with my old GPS-tracks from the last year (also on bicycle). Then I downloaded all available GPS-tracks in the area (most of them were recorded on auto, I think) and verify the correctness and consistency of the offset created (I checked that most of the tracks were inside of the roads - it is important to make it outside of the village, as buildings can distort GPS-signals!).
Properly aligned imagery and GPS-tracks were used to fix the roads and paths first. As some buildings crossed the paths and streets, I had to move them. As far as I saw, most of the objects in Laiferde were created with really old aerial maps, so they were misaligned even in comparison with newer satellite maps without offset.
Then I found that many objects were missing... So, in principle, it was almost total rebuilt of Leiferde.
I hope that fellow mappers will read this comment to understand, why so many changes were made, before they will decide to move objects according to non-corrected satellite maps

There is, probably, a huge offset for Bing and Mapbox, but I can't fix it as recorded GPS-traces (two devices simultaneously) were made on cyclepath Schwülper-Neubrück (and it is still not visible on aerial/satellite maps)

NB: circle at HBStr/Eckenerstr/Lilientalplatz is already made, but I can't properly draw it with my GPS-tracks. So the crossings is still in the old shape, as well as sidewalks around.

Incorrect commentary to the set (autofilling is bad!).

Correct commentary: shared cyclepath between Fallersleben and Ehmen was modified in accordance with (osm.wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren).
Some crossings and roads around were also affected. Bus routes should be safe, but I'll check it via PTNA

Problems with uploading changeset from JOSM, it was the second part. Probably, conflict of the versions (I will re-check these bus relations via PTNA and fix them if something went wrong)

Additional comment: in general, crossing of Helmstedter Str. and Brodweg looks not really good - too many lines are there. Probably it is better to re-draw it with (e.g., merge cyclepath and sidewalk, but add tag "segregated=yes" or similar).
Rautheimer Str./Margarete-Streiff-Str. is finished now and should be improved (probably, would be simpler with new aerial maps...).
To do: check, which signs are there: Z239 or Z240 (it is important for improvement of cyclemaps!)

Service road to Übergabebahnhof Beddingen was explictly tagged "yes" for bicycles and pedestrians as it available for them

Footpaths along Helmstedter Str. in Klein Schöpenstedt were transformed to sidewalks, some crossings were added and improved. Positioning was improved.
NB: when the new aerial maps will be available, it is important to re-draw the circle on Helmstedter Str/K141 (it is already exist, but cyclepaths and crossings around are not entirely correct mapped)

Note: crossing of Herman-Blenk-Straße and Eckenerstraße is now under reconstruction (actual: October 2021). After this reconstruction there should be a circle-crossings. Probably, in 2022 with new aerial map this whole area should be re-mapped again (e.g., some buildings are already there, but not in the aerial maps)

As this edit shows very broad affected area, I think that I should leave additional comment.

Abandoned "Braunschweig-Schöninger Eisenbahn" was probably affected during my edits of cyclepath in Schapen (this cyclepath, as I suppose, has merged nodes with this former railroad).

Addition: tag "official" was changed to "designated" for consistency (btw, using tag "official" was probably incorrect)