KindredCoda's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 171562119 | Yes, I will rectify this issue. -Coda |
|
| 166046667 | Also changed all roles to 'part'. |
|
| 166046667 | Ok, I've changed the relation to a building. |
|
| 149930898 | I did not name this, I only cleared some of the trees away for the parkway. |
|
| 139096431 | A mistake on my part… Thank you for the heads up!
|
|
| 106297439 | Hello, I have changed the main name back to "The Crossining" simply due to the fact that I could not find an official name for this bridge. If and when I find out an official name for this bridge, then and only then will I change it. Thanks,
|
|
| 50429282 | If I recall correctly, the polygon was not displaying correctly, and I was attempting to get it to do so. Please take whatever means necessary to make sure it works properly if it’s still incorrect. |
|
| 53464755 | Well, either way, my only edit there was to neaten those curved ends to match the rest of the bridge’s ways. In the larger picture, I honestly have no idea how highways with moveable barriers should be tagged/drawn in OSM, and suspect that others would know better than I. Maybe there’s a thread regarding similar issues on other bridges/roadways? |
|
| 53464755 | Hi, I had originally drawn it at two carriageways, but some dope recently decided to make it one. In addition, the road looked messy and horrible around the curves. I decided to clean up the curves and leave it as-is otherwise, because I can’t seem to stop people from messing up my work for no apparent reason. But if you want to revert back to my dual carriageway version, I’d be very happy. |
|
| 52717295 | Geopositioning data does not work underground and is therefore inaccurate. My alignment was based on USGS topographic maps, please revert. |
|
| 26523559 | I'll do both from now on. |
|
| 26523559 | Bing aerial. |