Kanchenjunga's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 98510744 | Hello ChehrehBargi, thank you for your message. I see that the link classification is preferred for these types of dual carriage road connections. Your rationale makes sense and I will leave these connections as you have mapped them in the future. Best regards. |
|
| 100483513 | Hello Ezagren, thanks for your comment. Reviewing this area again, I agree with your classification changes. Thank you for making those updates. Halo Ezagren, terima kasih atas komentar Anda. Meninjau kembali area ini, saya setuju dengan perubahan klasifikasi Anda. Terima kasih telah membuat pembaruan tersebut. |
|
| 104610710 | Thanks for mentioning this and restoring the tags. It looks like Biker69 was trying to remove the name from the R49 section rather than the entire merged way. I will try to verify that no tags were lost after noticing things like this. |
|
| 105418535 | Thank you for telling me and changing it back to service. Terima kasih telah memberi tahu saya dan mengubahnya kembali ke layanan. |
|
| 81810727 | Thanks for commenting. Since the road is still very important as the main route to the airport and E001 from the east, but it is not controlled access, should we classify it as trunk instead of primary or motorway? |