Have you been here? As a local I was here many times. The surface is far from compacted: it is just loose gravel.

On OSM wiki you can clearly see that grade1 means that the surface is asphalt, concrete or paved:
tracktype=*

Why are you using
tracktype=grade1 (PAVED)
when the track is UNPAVED (surface=unpaved)?

Ok, will change

In OSM restrictions I can not find better tag for this sign:
https://pomocnik.meblosignalizacija.si/images/prepovedan-promet-za-motorna-vozila-s-priklopnim-vozilom-2209-144.png

Do you have an alternative tag suggestion?
osm.wiki/Restrictions

Najpomembnejše je to, da naslovi sploh delajo v native OSM iskalniku.
Ker smo se dogovorili da morajo imeti naslovi addr:street, se torej ali poimenuje bližnje ulice ali pa se na vsak naslov doda addr:place.
Tako se zadosti SLO standardu in iskalnik OSM deluje.

addr:street je vezano na ime ulice, to je osnovna funkcionalnost OSM, ki se ne bo kar tako spremenila. To ni problem "ostalih programov"!
addr:street=*
Če blizu lokacije tega naslova ni ulice z enakim poimenovanjem, iskalnik tega naslova enostavno ne bo našel.

Si poskušal poiskati naslov?
Tole je rezultat v native OSM iskalnika:
osm.org/search?query=majcni%2015#map=14/45.74575/13.93605
Naslova enostavno ne dobi, dobi samo kraj.
A ni to osnovna funkcionalnost zemljevida, da lahko poiščeš naslov? Če to ne deluje v native OSM je potem res brezpredmetno da so sploh hišne številke vnesene, ker itak ne delajo.

Če nočeš uporabljati imena ulice je edina alternativa da se spremeni vse naslove v addr:place. Tako se zagotovi, da se lahko išče po naslovih.
addr:place in addr:street se lahko uporabljata skupaj, tako da se lahko zagotovi združljivost za naprej in za nazaj.

Zakaj si odstranil ta street name?
Če se odstrani street name je treba spremeniti vse hišne številke iz addr:street v addr:place, saj sedaj iskalnik OSM ne najde teh naslovov! Torej je kot da hišne šđtevilke niso vnesene!

Za več informacij, preberi tole:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/uvoz-gursovih-naslovov-slovenia-address-import/86683/19

Is this really a suitable name for this path?

OSM wiki says:
"
Name is the name only
The names should be restricted to the name of the item in question only and should not include additional information not contained in the official name such as categories, types, descriptions, addresses, refs, or notes. However - if something has the official name "East 110th Street" this full name should be in the name notwithstanding the fact that the "street", the "110" and "east" might be deducible from some other information. If something really doesn't have a name, don't add a name to OpenStreetMap. Any additional information should be included in separate tags (see, e.g., aforementioned links) to identify its meaning.
"

osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

No it is not a problem of quality assurance tools, but a problem of address search.

Because of this revert the house addresses do not work any more!

For house addresses to work there must be a road name that is the same as street name in address.

Look at all of the errors in OSMOSE because of this revert:
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=16&lat=45.97832&lon=13.70838&item=xxxx&level=1%2C2%2C3&tags=addr&issue_uuid=4adb2e67-d409-ebed-8aa0-f9e451897cc2&loc=15/45.59041/13.74697

Because of this revert the house addresses do not work any more!

For house addresses to work there must be a road name that is the same as street name in address.

Look at all of the errors in OSMOSE because of this revert:
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=16&lat=45.97832&lon=13.70838&item=xxxx&level=1%2C2%2C3&tags=addr&issue_uuid=4adb2e67-d409-ebed-8aa0-f9e451897cc2&loc=15/45.59041/13.74697

Hvala z dokumentacijo, ki potrjuje, da je Branica pravilno označena kot presihajoči potok.

Edini večji pritok v temu zgornjem delu Branice je Hudournik Raša, ki je že označen kot presihajoč.

Poleti Branica popolnoma presahne, to se lahko vidi iz ARSO arhivskih hidroloških podatkov in s fizičnim opazovanjem struge v poletnem času.
Vir: https://antena.fe.uni-lj.si/literatura/SPZ-PAS/pdf/094_Zavivalca.pdf
Prav tako se
https://vode.arso.gov.si/hidarhiv/pov_arhiv_tab.php?p_vodotok=Branica&p_postaja=8640&p_leto=2018&b_arhiv=Prika%C5%BEi

Sorry, my bad.