Un reverted ... -> I reverted ...

Hi again,

in this building there is, or at least there was until a few months ago, a mortgage office. See here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.87338770000002&lng=4.32307000000003&z=19.9&pKey=1177619881071430&panos=true&x=0.7080561890019785&y=0.46817258540476525&zoom=1.7151188284318033&focus=photo&dateFrom=2025-01-01

It seems, from what I've seen on their website, that this shop, Ritons, is at the back of the building and the entry is the garage door at the front. Is that correct?

Also, can you confirm that the mortgage office is still there?

Cheers

Hi,

Mot Passant books shop was already on the map as a node (node/11390091208), which we prefer.

Un reverted this changeset.

Have a nice day

Hi,

if you look at the change history (1) of this way, you will see that I am the one who marked it as private, in version 2, a few years ago. I did it because the track was barred by a chain and there was a sign stating that this was a private property.
In version 3 another mapper deleted it. The change comment was 'weg afgesloten'.
I've seen that path barred by a chain a few times but it is not always the case.

You might be interested to know that the Flemish administration does maintain a register of public ways (2). It is also available as a layer on iD editor; look for 'Digitaal Vlaanderen Wegenregister'.
If you look at it you will see that other paths on these fields displayed but not this one. This makes me think that this one is on private land.

My assumption is that the owner do place the chain when work on the field is needed and leaves it open the rest of the time so the acces tag value should be, at very least, permissive

1) way/869100424/history
2) https://www.vlaanderen.be/digitaal-vlaanderen/onze-diensten-en-platformen/wegenregister

Hit enter button too fast.
The 'ghost bike' is not there anymore. Not sure it was a ghost bike after all

I hadn't seen Raphael's note yesterday when I wrote here, I saw it this morning.

Raphael visited the place as recently as yesterday morning ;-) and the gates were open: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=566427145793535&focus=photo

So, I think the current 'permissive' tag is the one that better represents the actual situation, as the gates seem not to be permanently closed.

Cheers

well, no strong opinion about private vs permissive tags here neither.

I happen to pass by there quite often, but mostly on week ends and, most of the time, the gates near Av. de Bouchout are closed. This is why it didn't surprised me that a fellow mapper marked the roads as private. I did the same for the sidewalks for the shake of coherence.

A few years ago, those gates used to be wide open but, these days, the whole 'Plateau du Heysel' has become a place where urban rodeos take place almost every single night. I guess this is the main reason why those gates remain closed as much as possible.

I changed the access tag of the eastern sidewalk, which allow to access the archery range next to it, to permissive as well: changeset/164179051

Cheers

Hi,

it seems that, on this changeset, you accidentally deleted the sidewalk south and west of Victor Boin Stadium.

Also, shouldn't the sidewalk north of Av. de Marathon have access=permissive as well till the second gate?

Cheers

It isn't private, see discussion here: note/4609657#map=15/50.88224/4.34463

It is indeed behind gates and the gate on Rue Alfred Stevens is currently closed. There is a sign at the door stating that, from the sixth of may on, only the entry on the other end, on Rue du Siphon, will be accessible: https://imgur.com/a/mMuYs2f

Hi,
would you be so kind as to explain what is the point of splitting land use polygons into adjacent, smaller ones of the same type?
FYI, data validation tools do complain in such cases.

Also, what is the purpose of those tiny 'bridges' linking different polygons together like, for example, this one:
osm.org/?mlat=50.912951&mlon=4.376137#map=19/50.913062/4.376217

Thanks

Hello again,

the image of this playground is depicting the one on Tour & Taxis site, next to Quai aux Poissons building.

way/1070407075

Hello,

it seems that your script is putting the panoramax id in the tag value AND the tag name.

Here is an example: way/973812650

Thanks,

I saw the image of the other map in the meantime.

Also, the bicycle barrier can be clearly seen in Digital Vlaanderen 2013-2015 imagery. It is located a few meters to the north of where you put it.

Cheers

Hola Thierry,

in another changeset, earlier today, you added another information map only a few meters away from the one you added here. Are there really two maps there?

changeset/158089356

Cheers

Hi,

you added operator:wikidata tag to every single node of the pipelines. Is that something wanted?

not sure what footprints you are refering to.
See here those that you marked as demolished:https://osmcha.org/changesets/157882748
You also deleted a couple of addr nodes

Hello,

in this changeset you marked as demolished several buildings on Rue Léopold I. Is that correct?

Those are apartments buildings that are quite recent, see here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.87868359999999&lng=4.3528093999999555&z=19.9&pKey=804340651767830&panos=true&x=0.7870549253509577&y=0.45580218324653793&zoom=0&focus=photo

Hello,

to clarify what bxl_forever meant, you can have a look here: https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#loc=16/50.899214/4.331348&item=1xxx&level=1%2C2%2C3

All those validation warnings appeared after your recent edits in this area. Most of them are duplicated nodes that should be merged together, but there are also, among other issues, invalid polygons that self intersect, like this one: way/1321784726#map=18/50.900367/4.332465

Thanks,

this sign is just a reminder, there is no sign on the opposite side signaling the end of the living street

Hi Thierry,

may I ask you what is your source here?
I didn't visited the place myself recently but, on this mapillary picture, from less than two months ago, it can be seen that the living street starts at the junction of Rue du Bois Henri and Clos du Craetbos:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/RaphaelPasLoin?lat=50.89670731200863&lng=4.383016055700068&z=18.006936867049134&pKey=504380659001518&dateFrom=2024-08-01&focus=photo&x=0.047539312989484106&y=0.3370726811445328&zoom=0.3583166823160871

Also it looks strange that the living street starts in the middle of the street as in your change set.

Cheers