Either way it is a legal crossing, and the unmarked crossing legal definition and osm tag exists for a reason. Routers can choose to ignore them if they share your opinion.

Thanks, I fixed the tactile paving. Feel free to correct the roads as I'm not sure which you are referring to.

From your own link: (Section 4-01 WORDS AND PHRASES DEFINED)
"Unmarked crosswalk. The term “unmarked crosswalk” means that part of a roadway,
other than a marked crosswalk, that is included within the extensions of the sidewalk lines
between opposite sides of the roadway at an intersection, provided that (A) the roadway
crosses through the intersection rather than ending at the intersection, and/or (B) all traffic
on the opposing roadway is controlled by a traffic control device." I highly doubt the city would spend money on tactile paving and lowered curbs if it didn't consider it a legal crosswalk.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152832212

I think given the tactile paving/lowered curbs, and the natural grid pattern of roads and sidewalks in a city, a crossing is always implied unless there is some barrier. Even if not marked as a crossing there should be a way between the end of sidewalk and road so pedestrian directions don't instruct you to go down to the next block just to cross the street. Fixed in changeset/153094708.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152832212

Not sure why you removed the unmarked crossings at E 180th and Ryer Ave. The NE corner only has one curb at the apex, which you've changed the position of.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152832212

Thanks for the feedback. I had attempted to salvage the existing polygon of the Russian compound but it was too tangled up with other nodes to spend the time to fix it properly. I appreciate the fixes!

changeset/152805041 and 152825610 have the relevant fixes.

Yes.

Apologies, the first editor I used did not warn about changeset comments, and did not allow entry of custom keys. I have corrected most of these invalid color values and am now using the "model" key as I originally intended. Thanks for the feedback.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/152554851