Hi, Mateusz, no problem, regards, Joris

Hello Fraxi, thank you for your message. I'm not familiar to the area, i only fixed typo's in access tagging for routing and in the meanwhile corrected some obvious alignments. Kind regards Joris

Hallo hufkratzer , danke dir deine Bemerkung . Dir noch nicht bekannt , da darfst es andern in etwas anderes . Grusse Joris

Dank, aangepast

Hallo mcliquid, entschuldigung dafür, danke für den korreltur, grusse Joris

Hi bashlnx, i only changed the odd access tagging 'foot=pedestal' . If you are known to the area, please change it to your best intentions. Kind regards, Joris

Thanks for the correction, kind regards Joris

Thank you !

Hi gurgylypipe ! Thank you for your reaction. Mixed/multiple access tagging is rather confusing for automated routing using osm data. Since general access already is 'no' in combination of the state of the comments it seemed not likely to me to 'route' people over this road same as 'via ferrata's' are not used for routing. Also the value discouraged "should" only be used if explicitly signed that way, not because a mapper thinks it is safer. For me no problem to change it back, i did miss the discussiion you mentioned. Kind regards Joris

Hello Udar ! Thx for your reply. Its hard to me to really figure out what i have to change or reverse. Please feel free to change it in whatever you think is best. Kind regards, Joris

Hallo Johsin, i changed it, regards Joris

np, regards, Joris

thx

thx

Sorry images of 2020, not very sharp, Regards, Joris

Hi Dave, thank you for you question, What is the source of your public footpath? Is it ground trouth? Does it really crosses building roofs and golf greens? On july 2025 microsoft streetview images show no such connection or path. It would not be nice if all kinds of routing apps suggest you shortcuts through highways that don't exists. Kind regards Joris

Hi rskedgell, thanks for your message. I'm not familiar to the area. I tried to figure out the changes over the past years. My change 4 years ago was bicycle=unsuitable to common tagging bicycle=no. I don't have more info. kind regards, Joris

Hallo SilverSurfer
It's a reminder to easily find access restrictions which are temporary and very often forgotten to be removed afterwords. Kind regards, Joris

Dag Marc!, bedankt voor je berichtje. de wat onhandige tagging voor building en name zijn 8 jaar geleden aangemaakt door Nathan. Ik weet niet wat voor shop het is, misschien weet nathan het, Groetjes Joris

Hallo Hungerburg, i reverted the change back to multivalue customers;forestry. However i don't see the real difference between forestry=yes and vehicle=forestry, unless forestry access by bicycle/foot is forbidden. Hoffe es ist wieder richtig fur dich. grussen Joris