OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
176700589 less than 1 minute ago

If you're using this church in a back-street next to the huge landmark of the Vondelpark to navigate by, you have bigger problems.

Don't worry: in a few months/years it will probably be a building again:

https://nos.nl/artikel/2596704-eerste-bewoners-terug-naar-huis-na-brand-vondelkerk-goede-hoop-op-herstel

Different mapping strategies exist. If the tags used here were wrong you'd have a point, but they are not.

176700589 5 minutes ago

andrewsh: We would be retagging all highway=busway and landuse=education to highway=service and amenity=school by that argument (because Carto doesn't render those). Doing that is not the consensus.

176700589 7 minutes ago

TrickyFoxy: yeah, I've looked at entities with only a ruins:building:

way/888868619

Nominatim seems to be broken for those.

176700589 9 minutes ago

Current status is that the thing burned down; the tagging reflects that. What happens next is up to the municipality, and not relevant to this discussion.

Someone got here before you and used tags you wouldn't have. However, those tags are valid, and using them is one way to get support for them improved.

When the next church burns down, see if you can be the first to edit it, and use the tags you used (which are also valid).

176700589 13 minutes ago

Those counter-examples are based on the assumption that the tag used is not popular and incorrect. For lifecycle-prefixes this is false on both counts.

176700589 26 minutes ago

Don't tag for the renderer. File bugs with them if you want them to support it.

Lifecycle prefixes are broadly used and are valid tagging. If someone chooses that approach, redoing their work is not appreciated.

176700589 about 1 hour ago

Waarom? Er is niks mis met ruins:building. Lifecycle prefixes zijn breed gedragen en goed gedocumenteerd.

Teruggezet naar de versie van TrickyFoxy.

176261454 9 days ago

Nee klopt. Algemene nummers horen daar niet thuis.

176261454 10 days ago

Ik zie het nummer wel staan bij Zwolle, maar Amsterdam noemt geen nummer.

176261454 10 days ago

Ik kan die telefoonnummers niet terugvinden op de bron die je noemt. Het zijn ook allemaal 088-nummers. Horen die wel bij de vestigingen? En zo ja, zijn ze wel openbaar?

176219181 11 days ago

If you really dislike the way portage is used on waterways, you could propose an alternative which keeps the information (like 'use_portage'), but that would require coordination with other canoe mappers.

Either way, replacing these with 'no' results in loss of valid data, so please do revert.

176219181 11 days ago

I've documented ice_skates=kluning myself. I used canoe=portage as an example, so I am familiar with both. I've made some edits to the canoe documentation as well, which I've discussed with others using that tag at the time.

At that point the use of portage on a waterway was analogous to use_sidepath: it is a 'no' which indicates the why as well (a detour is available and either mandatory or physically required).

That is useful, because data consumers rendering a map for non-powered boats can indicate that that stretch of water is part of the route, but requires portage, as distinct from a blocked part of the route with no mapped portage alternative.

If you want to change the meaning of an existing tag, opening a discussion would be step one. By making edits in small areas you are changing an existing tagging scheme quite under the radar. That is not the right way to approach this.

176219181 11 days ago

canoe=portage on a waterway is defined as meaning that you cannot pass there using a canoe (ice_skating is similar). Is this a misunderstanding on your part, or did I miss the discussion about this? The wiki shows nothing on the talk-page for canoe or canoe=portage.

176219181 11 days ago

What you are doing is not in line with how the wiki documents this. Are you just unilaterally deciding that this tagging method is not OK?

176012318 16 days ago

Bijvoorbeeld: way/952082146

176012318 16 days ago

Als je van een track een service maakt, dan moet je tracktype vervangen door surface. Dus tracktype=grade1 (of grade2) wordt dan surface=paved, grade3 en hoger wordt surface=unpaved of surface=grass.

Die tracktype hoort alleen bij highway=track namelijk.

175726662 23 days ago

Bij highway=footway laten we bicycle=no weg, die is impliciet.

167999251 29 days ago

This change was reverted. Please don't assume that 'paad' is a misspelling. In this province names can be written in Frisian, Dutch, or a local dialect.

175288450 about 1 month ago

Wat doet connect:lanes? Ik zie geen documentatie voor die tag of prefix.

175105816 about 1 month ago

Zou je iets uitgebreider kunnen zijn in je changeset-commentaar? Alleen de plaatsnaam zegt erg weinig over wat je doet.

Zie ook:

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments