Ahi cambié las otras calles en construccion que tenian estas caracteristicas. Los otros tags, como lanes, surface, oneway, etc. cuando el highway=contruction, le quite el prefix

El tramo mencionado de ruta de RN21 a mi entender quedó bien. Al revertir el cambio volvieron los tags construction:lanes. que en este caso me parecen válidos ya q la carretera está activa y con sus lanes específicos. Al resto de las rutas que estaban con highway=construction, le eliminé el consrtuction:highway=* por las razones que comenté antes.
Avísame si crees que hay otra cosa por enmendar/mejorar.

Ahi estoy revirtiendo el cambio. Quitando los construction:highway=*, cuando hay un construction=*.
En cuanto a los construction:lanes, el validador tira error. No le gusta que no encuentra un lanes=*
A mi entender cuando la highway=construction, se debe usar lanes=* en vez de construction:lanes.
solo usaría construction:lanes=* si se trata de una calle vigente que ya tiene lanes=* y se esta ensanchando con más carriles.

hola mweper,
disculpa si rompí algo, fue sin intensión.
La edició la hice por una recomendacion de la wiki de construction en una sección posibles errores.
highway=construction#Possible_tagging_mistakes
bueno, la cuestión que segui el link a un query overpass turbo donde aparecieron resultados en Argentina.
Si consideras que no estan bien hechos. lo revierto. No hay problema. Avisame.
Saludos

ahi vi el puente y le agregué algun tag

Hola Vicente. Veo que le quitaste el tag de construction al 2da circunvalacion.
No estuvo bien quitarle el tag.
Cuando la highway es construction hay que indicar que es lo qué tipo de ruta se está construyendo.
te dejo un link de la wiki con breve explicacion al respecto
osm.wiki/ES:Tag:highway%3Dconstruction

Hola Vicente, la ruta tiene el separador New Jersey al medio, y no un espacio verde al medio como las autopistas. Así que cambié la clasificación de acuerdo a la guía de la wiki de Argentina. Saludos

💪

Hola pertile, los 6km pavimentados son, de acuerdo a las imágenes de la noticia, los más cercanos al puebl/ciudad. Y por lo que se explica en la noticia el resto falta. Digo porque el cambio esa al revés.
Saludos

Hello! Thank you for the updates. It seems your changeset crosses many continents/countries. Please retain your changeset smaller. Let reviewers and other mappers check your edit more easily. It's impossible (almost) to keep track of the database and changes if changes in huge areas.
So I kindly ask you when you edit, retain your changeset in a particular smaller area -such as countries/provinces/municipality- save it first and then move to another area. Examples:
you are adding/modifying 10 objects in 2 distant cities => make 2 changesets, 1 per city.
you are adding/modifying 5 objects in 5 countries => make 5 changesets, 1 per country.
You'll find more information on the reason in this article: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Hello! Thank you for the updates. It seems your changeset crosses many continents/countries. Please retain your changeset smaller. Let reviewers and other mappers check your edit more easily. It's impossible (almost) to keep track of the database and changes if changes in huge areas.
So I kindly ask you when you edit, retain your changeset in a particular smaller area -such as countries/provinces/municipality- save it first and then move to another area. Examples:
you are adding/modifying 10 objects in 2 distant cities => make 2 changesets, 1 per city.
you are adding/modifying 5 objects in 5 countries => make 5 changesets, 1 per country.
You'll find more information on the reason in this article: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Hello! Thank you for the updates. It seems your changeset crosses many continents/countries. Please retain your changeset smaller. Let reviewers and other mappers check your edit more easily. It's impossible (almost) to keep track of the database and changes if changes in huge areas.
So I kindly ask you when you edit, retain your changeset in a particular smaller area -such as countries/provinces/municipality- save it first and then move to another area. Examples:
you are adding/modifying 10 objects in 2 distant cities => make 2 changesets, 1 per city.
you are adding/modifying 5 objects in 5 countries => make 5 changesets, 1 per country.
You'll find more information on the reason in this article: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Hello! Thank you for the updates. It seems your changeset crosses many continents/countries. Please retain your changeset smaller. Let reviewers and other mappers check your edit more easily. It's impossible (almost) to keep track of the database and changes if changes in huge areas.
So I kindly ask you when you edit, retain your changeset in a particular smaller area -such as countries/provinces/municipality- save it first and then move to another area. Examples:
You are adding/modifying 10 objects in 2 distant cities => make 2 changesets, 1 per city.
you are adding/modifying 5 objects in 5 countries => make 5 changesets, 1 per country.
You'll find more information on the reason in this article: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Hello! Thank you for the updates. It seems your changeset crosses many countries. Please retain your changeset smaller. Let reviewers and other mappers check your edit more easily. It's impossible (almost) to keep track of the database and changes if changes in huge areas.
So I kindly ask you when you edit, retain your changeset in a particular smaller area -such as countries/provinces/municipality- save it first and then move to another area. Examples:
you are adding/modifying 10 objects in 2 distant cities => make 2 changesets, 1 per city.
you are adding/modifying 5 objects in 5 countries => make 5 changesets, 1 per country.
You'll find more information on the reason in this article: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Hello! Thank you for the updates. your changeset crosses many countries. Let reviewers and other mappers could check your edit easier. it's impossible (almost) to keep track of the database and changes if changes in huge areas. Please retain your changeset smaller.
So I kindly ask you when you edit, retain your changeset in a particular smaller area -such as countries/provinces/municipality- save it first and then move to another area. Examples:
you are adding/modifying 10 objects in 2 distant cities => make 2 changesets, 1 per city.
you are adding/modifying 5 objects in 5 countries => make 5 changesets, 1 per country.
You'll find more information on the reason in this article: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Hello! Thank you for the updates. It seems your changeset crosses many countries. Please retain your changeset smaller. Let reviewers and other mappers could check your edit easier. it's impossible (almost) to keep track of the database and changes if changes in huge areas.
So I kindly ask you when you edit, retain your changeset in a particular smaller area -such as countries/provinces/municipality- save it first and then move to another area. Examples:
you are adding/modifying 10 objects in 2 distant cities => make 2 changesets, 1 per city.
you are adding/modifying 5 objects in 5 countries => make 5 changesets, 1 per country.
You'll find more information on the reason in this article: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Hello Agus! gracias por las actualizaciones. El changeset cruza varias provincias. para los revisores y otros mappers es mejor tener cambios en areas más pequeñas. Asi que si es posible hay que tratar de mantener los changeset en areas pequeñas circuncriptas a provinces/municipality. Por ej.
Si se está modificando 10 objectos en 2 ciudades distantes => entonces hacer 2 changesets, 1 per ciudad.
Si se está cambiando 14 objectos in 5 países => hacer 5 changesets, 1 por países.
Podés encontrar más info en este artículo: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Gracias Andrés, sos un capo!.
Saludos

Hola Andrés. Veo que sos muy colaborativo y mantienes actualizado el proyecto. Gracias por ello. Este cambio ha quedado demasiado extenso pasando por varias provincias. Si las haces en áreas mas pequeñas es mas fácil para los revisores. Limitando a una sola provincia o ciudad el cambio ayudaría. Se puede encontrar más razones en el siguiente articulo: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Hello! Thank you for the updates. It seems your changeset crosses many continents/countries. Please retain your changeset smaller. Let reviewers and other mappers could check your edit easier. it's impossible (almost) to keep track of the database and changes if changes in huge areas.
So I kindly ask you when you edit, retain your changeset in a particular smaller area -such as countries/provinces/municipality- save it first and then move to another area. Examples:
you are adding/modifying 10 objects in 2 distant cities => make 2 changesets, 1 per city.
you are adding/modifying 5 objects in 5 countries => make 5 changesets, 1 per country.
You'll find more information on the reason in this article: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets