Nicht voellig "reverted", es steht noch etwas Dreck. Vielleicht war es witzig gemeint, ich aber siehe nur Vandalismus.

Thanks for elaborate and firendly discussion - this is the right way to achieve progress! And yes, indeed, the two nodes under discussion would be - for so far as I can see, and judge - better tagged with "aeroway=threshold". According to our wiki, "aeroway=airstrip" is to be used as an alternative to "aeroway=aerodrome" for very simple aerodromes, with only a single runway and little more infrastructure. Most kindly!

This changeset makes improper use of the tag "aeroway=airstrip" at both ends of the 15/33 runway. I intend to remove all tags from both nodes, they do not add useful information.

Why tag this aerodrome as disused? If Wikipedia is to be believed, the airfield is operational.

Excuse me if this sounds rude, but it looks "somewhat difficult to imagine" to see a runway at this location. What were you trying to accomplish? I'd like to be of help, but feel inclined to remove this database entry.

Obrigado :) !

This Aerodromo de Salceda, is it still active? It does not look like that, on satellite imagery.

Netjes zo, welbedankt!

Thank you indeed! It is nice to agree :)

As far as I can see, the aerodrome remains active, you should not have removed it. Please repair the damage.
https://www.hultsfredairport.se/information-flygflight/

https://aterriza.org/villena-emerg/

Please stop removing the aeroway=aerodrome tag. Veuillez cesser d'enlever le tag aeroway=aerodrome. Merci.

ok, adjusted, thanks.

Regarding "HLS1": how can this be an aerodrome? Where is it documented? At best there is a helipad, but even that is not discernable.

why did you remove the LP69 local_ref? It comes from the eAIP!

Ah, that's a well-known trap. The site you named is notoriusly unreliable, due to their "creative" solutions. In this case they took over the internal reference of another aerodrome repository (to which I also contribute): https://ourairports.com/airports/GB-0843/
With your leave, I'll remove the reference from OSM.
And no, it seems unlikely that this modest farm strip has any other function.
Greetings!

It is nice agree! Still, where does that reference come from? It does not look like anything I've seen before.
Kind regards!

Where does that GB-0843 reference come from? It seems to identify the "aerodrome" rather than its runway, see node/7525418680.

The one thing I changed is to add tag aeroway=heliport to the total area of the museum, way/1285803622
It is important that runways should always be associated with an aerodrome, be it aeroway=aerodrome or heliport or airstrip, because flight plans include aerodromes, not runways.
For as much as I am concerned, the database is now fine in this area.

Thank you! I would then suggest to create a proper Heliport - IMHO we cannot have runways without an aerdrome associated because flight planners know aerodromes, not runways.