sure, I'm happy to align with Bing. I am aware of imagery offsets, but I was offsetting the various imagery layers to match Blacksburg's public domain GIS data since that was the easiest reference I could find for precise locations, since once you get to small enough scales, GPX traces are pretty hard to reference off of. I figured it's definitely possible some of their data comes from VBMP or there are coordinate system conversion issues but it was the best I had. Happy to use whatever offsets you think are best if you've put thought into it.

Yeah it's a weird gap in the address tagging scheme-- you'd think there would be a standard by now that includes the info needed to write a correct address without addr:full=*. After doing some quick searching to see what was out there, I mostly threw it in since it doesn't conflict with any existing schemes so would be easy enough to remove or do an automated migration on if people decide a better way of doing it. I don't have strong opinions and wouldn't care if it was removed, but for a town with many secondary units, it would be nice for us to handle it somehow. Maybe I'll have to finally join the slack...

I believe there may be some new parking in some of this space at some point, but considering the existing lot looked pretty gone and any new parking would need completely new geometry, I didn't think it was worth trying to preserve history for the new version.

Feel free to work on it! There weren't many other big things that jumped out to me in that area.

thanks— part of the "parking lot" was rebuilt and is now set up for vacuuming after the washes(not really sure how to tag that) and there are some automated payment gates. maybe I'll try to get pictures next time I walk by.

Feel free to go ahead and do NE if you're willing to!

Thanks for the catch, should be resolved now: changeset/168118926

*wrong changeset description, updated NMP, not NMG

Sure, I added it back. Thanks.