I was doing some cleanup and added some abandoned rail using usgs 3d elevation program data and compared it to esri data.

Thanks for the changelog comment tips. I’ll start to work on better descriptions.

As for the boundary relations, I think I’m a little limited on id on my iPad on fixing this issue then waiting for hours for it to show on Osm inspector on http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/ to see whether it is incorrect. I’m hoping to find a good tool like josm but for an iPad device.

It should be repaired. I’ve been using osm inspector to repair errors recently and must have buggered this one.

I’ve got one user telling me to use multipolygons instead of closed ways (with =area) because it’s easier to edit. And now another telling me not to do it that way and use closed ways. I’d rather not do this at all if I causing someone else more work.

Ok, I’ll stop adding land over if I’m doing it incorrectly.

Ok, that’s a better classification.

I see what where you were referencing. One of those areas should have been tagged as scrub and not woods. I repaired it.

Natural=wood should be correct. I removed the managed=forest tag though as it is incorrect.

I repaired the error. I think I had an error with the relation. I fixed the Camp Legeune tags and added a new relation for Camp Davis with correct tags.

The relation may be wrong. I cannot access right now but I Can look into it this evening.

Ok, I edited map to show as “unmaintained track road”. Thank you for letting me know my error and I will do this in the future. :)