Bình luận của InsertUser
| Bộ thay đổi | Lúc đăng | Bình luận |
|---|---|---|
| 176270361 | 10 ngày trước | Why have you relocated demolished buildings? You're using JOSM. If they're in the way just filter them. |
| 176163428 | 16 ngày trước | That shoud ahve said "Traced building from imagery". |
| 175858931 | 17 ngày trước | This is a private facility. There is no public access except to customers. Even if there were then it would be access=permissive, not foot=yes. |
| 175858982 | 17 ngày trước | `foot=yes` indicates that everyone has the legal right to access a place on foot. This is a private jetty, there is no public access. |
| 175595056 | 19 ngày trước | Replacing wrong tags with more wrong tagging is hardly an improvement. Map changes should be individually reviewed unless there has been previous discussion of the edit in line with the automated edits code of conduct. Transmuting nonsense into more nonsense helps no one. |
| 174346798 | khoảng 2 tháng trước | Why would they be tagged with the default assumption for that wetland type? |
| 174346798 | khoảng 2 tháng trước | They're mangroves tagged in outside of the coastline, how could they be anything other than salt water and tidal? |
| 173874623 | khoảng 2 tháng trước | Please don't put building tags areas that aren't actual buildings. |
| 172968285 | 3 tháng trước | You needed to create a changeset spanning three continents to add "a missing road segment"?? |
| 173021435 | 3 tháng trước | Please save in between edits in completely different areas. |
| 172857276 | 3 tháng trước | Is this not `emergency:amenity=social_facility` + `emergency:social_facility=shelter` rather than `emergency:amenity=shelter`? |
| 172828877 | 3 tháng trước | Really? |
| 172812724 | 3 tháng trước | I don't have a strong opinion on this, but I do think this feature has much broader recognition than Null Island. |
| 172729076 | 3 tháng trước | I've struggled to tag facilities like these in the past. I think the most appropriate tag we currently have is `emergency:social_facility=shelter`. |
| 172576860 | 3 tháng trước | This seems to be a duplicate of: way/594022184 Is this the name that's actually on the sign? |
| 171515928 | 4 tháng trước | Please use different changesets for uploads in different continents. |
| 170935419 | 4 tháng trước | Reverted due to prohibited source, see: |
| 170928726 | 4 tháng trước | Reverted due to prohibited source and duplication of existing ways. |
| 170502128 | 5 tháng trước | Please save in between edits in different continents. |
| 170132955 | 5 tháng trước | What is the benefit of removing the human readable tag in favour of something more opaque? |