Comentariile InsertUser
| Set de modificări | Când | Comentariu |
|---|---|---|
| 176270361 | cu 8 zile în urmă | Why have you relocated demolished buildings? You're using JOSM. If they're in the way just filter them. |
| 176163428 | cu 14 zile în urmă | That shoud ahve said "Traced building from imagery". |
| 175858931 | cu 16 zile în urmă | This is a private facility. There is no public access except to customers. Even if there were then it would be access=permissive, not foot=yes. |
| 175858982 | cu 16 zile în urmă | `foot=yes` indicates that everyone has the legal right to access a place on foot. This is a private jetty, there is no public access. |
| 175595056 | cu 17 zile în urmă | Replacing wrong tags with more wrong tagging is hardly an improvement. Map changes should be individually reviewed unless there has been previous discussion of the edit in line with the automated edits code of conduct. Transmuting nonsense into more nonsense helps no one. |
| 174346798 | aproximativ 2 luni în urmă | Why would they be tagged with the default assumption for that wetland type? |
| 174346798 | aproximativ 2 luni în urmă | They're mangroves tagged in outside of the coastline, how could they be anything other than salt water and tidal? |
| 173874623 | aproximativ 2 luni în urmă | Please don't put building tags areas that aren't actual buildings. |
| 172968285 | cu 3 luni în urmă | You needed to create a changeset spanning three continents to add "a missing road segment"?? |
| 173021435 | cu 3 luni în urmă | Please save in between edits in completely different areas. |
| 172857276 | cu 3 luni în urmă | Is this not `emergency:amenity=social_facility` + `emergency:social_facility=shelter` rather than `emergency:amenity=shelter`? |
| 172828877 | cu 3 luni în urmă | Really? |
| 172812724 | cu 3 luni în urmă | I don't have a strong opinion on this, but I do think this feature has much broader recognition than Null Island. |
| 172729076 | cu 3 luni în urmă | I've struggled to tag facilities like these in the past. I think the most appropriate tag we currently have is `emergency:social_facility=shelter`. |
| 172576860 | cu 3 luni în urmă | This seems to be a duplicate of: way/594022184 Is this the name that's actually on the sign? |
| 171515928 | cu 4 luni în urmă | Please use different changesets for uploads in different continents. |
| 170935419 | cu 4 luni în urmă | Reverted due to prohibited source, see: |
| 170928726 | cu 4 luni în urmă | Reverted due to prohibited source and duplication of existing ways. |
| 170502128 | cu 5 luni în urmă | Please save in between edits in different continents. |
| 170132955 | cu 5 luni în urmă | What is the benefit of removing the human readable tag in favour of something more opaque? |