Commenti di InsertUser
| Gruppo di modifiche | Quando | Commento |
|---|---|---|
| 176270361 | 6 giorni fa | Why have you relocated demolished buildings? You're using JOSM. If they're in the way just filter them. |
| 176163428 | 12 giorni fa | That shoud ahve said "Traced building from imagery". |
| 175858931 | 14 giorni fa | This is a private facility. There is no public access except to customers. Even if there were then it would be access=permissive, not foot=yes. |
| 175858982 | 14 giorni fa | `foot=yes` indicates that everyone has the legal right to access a place on foot. This is a private jetty, there is no public access. |
| 175595056 | 15 giorni fa | Replacing wrong tags with more wrong tagging is hardly an improvement. Map changes should be individually reviewed unless there has been previous discussion of the edit in line with the automated edits code of conduct. Transmuting nonsense into more nonsense helps no one. |
| 174346798 | circa 2 mesi fa | Why would they be tagged with the default assumption for that wetland type? |
| 174346798 | circa 2 mesi fa | They're mangroves tagged in outside of the coastline, how could they be anything other than salt water and tidal? |
| 173874623 | circa 2 mesi fa | Please don't put building tags areas that aren't actual buildings. |
| 172968285 | 3 mesi fa | You needed to create a changeset spanning three continents to add "a missing road segment"?? |
| 173021435 | 3 mesi fa | Please save in between edits in completely different areas. |
| 172857276 | 3 mesi fa | Is this not `emergency:amenity=social_facility` + `emergency:social_facility=shelter` rather than `emergency:amenity=shelter`? |
| 172828877 | 3 mesi fa | Really? |
| 172812724 | 3 mesi fa | I don't have a strong opinion on this, but I do think this feature has much broader recognition than Null Island. |
| 172729076 | 3 mesi fa | I've struggled to tag facilities like these in the past. I think the most appropriate tag we currently have is `emergency:social_facility=shelter`. |
| 172576860 | 3 mesi fa | This seems to be a duplicate of: way/594022184 Is this the name that's actually on the sign? |
| 171515928 | 4 mesi fa | Please use different changesets for uploads in different continents. |
| 170935419 | 4 mesi fa | Reverted due to prohibited source, see: |
| 170928726 | 4 mesi fa | Reverted due to prohibited source and duplication of existing ways. |
| 170502128 | 5 mesi fa | Please save in between edits in different continents. |
| 170132955 | 5 mesi fa | What is the benefit of removing the human readable tag in favour of something more opaque? |