InsertUser's Comments
| Changeset | Cuant | Coment |
|---|---|---|
| 176270361 | 13 zornadis indaûr | Why have you relocated demolished buildings? You're using JOSM. If they're in the way just filter them. |
| 176163428 | 19 zornadis indaûr | That shoud ahve said "Traced building from imagery". |
| 175858931 | 20 zornadis indaûr | This is a private facility. There is no public access except to customers. Even if there were then it would be access=permissive, not foot=yes. |
| 175858982 | 20 zornadis indaûr | `foot=yes` indicates that everyone has the legal right to access a place on foot. This is a private jetty, there is no public access. |
| 175595056 | 22 zornadis indaûr | Replacing wrong tags with more wrong tagging is hardly an improvement. Map changes should be individually reviewed unless there has been previous discussion of the edit in line with the automated edits code of conduct. Transmuting nonsense into more nonsense helps no one. |
| 174346798 | 2 mês indaûr | Why would they be tagged with the default assumption for that wetland type? |
| 174346798 | 2 mês indaûr | They're mangroves tagged in outside of the coastline, how could they be anything other than salt water and tidal? |
| 173874623 | 2 mês indaûr | Please don't put building tags areas that aren't actual buildings. |
| 172968285 | 3 mês indaûr | You needed to create a changeset spanning three continents to add "a missing road segment"?? |
| 173021435 | 3 mês indaûr | Please save in between edits in completely different areas. |
| 172857276 | 3 mês indaûr | Is this not `emergency:amenity=social_facility` + `emergency:social_facility=shelter` rather than `emergency:amenity=shelter`? |
| 172828877 | 3 mês indaûr | Really? |
| 172812724 | 3 mês indaûr | I don't have a strong opinion on this, but I do think this feature has much broader recognition than Null Island. |
| 172729076 | 3 mês indaûr | I've struggled to tag facilities like these in the past. I think the most appropriate tag we currently have is `emergency:social_facility=shelter`. |
| 172576860 | 3 mês indaûr | This seems to be a duplicate of: way/594022184 Is this the name that's actually on the sign? |
| 171515928 | 4 mês indaûr | Please use different changesets for uploads in different continents. |
| 170935419 | 5 mês indaûr | Reverted due to prohibited source, see: |
| 170928726 | 5 mês indaûr | Reverted due to prohibited source and duplication of existing ways. |
| 170502128 | 5 mês indaûr | Please save in between edits in different continents. |
| 170132955 | 5 mês indaûr | What is the benefit of removing the human readable tag in favour of something more opaque? |