If you have visited it yourself then no further source is necessary and you can use source=survey.

It would probably be best to add a lifecycle prefix like "abandoned:" to the main key of the features so that it doesn't get added back based on other databases.

osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

A suggestion to standardise tagging of links to Grokipedia has been rejected on the basis that it is largely junk.

It is not an acceptable source.

If they still exist they're perfectly valid for mapping.

Yes, I was aware that you arbitrarily changed it away from the tagging recommended on the landuse=orchard page to a weird hybrid of orchard and forest tagging.

It's in a farm and they were seen from a plane. It wasn't the best opportunity to see what fruit looked like.

Have they finally moved in then?

Do you happen to know whether they've completely abandoned the building over the bridge now or is it still being used for some things?

The larger area looks like it's probably more of a subsea=bank ?

If you have the current information for this shop then feel free to update the data to be correct.

Could you please focus your changesets on a single continent in future?

Ah, so this is why JOSM complains about a "Non-Way in Multipolygon" now.

This seems to go against the current wiki docs for relations of type=multipolygon.

According to Mapillary imagery from November 2023 this looks like it becomes a mixture of highway=footpath and highway=steps that continues south of the way now called Greenwich Street North for some distance.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=950933753030826&focus=photo

Has this been torn up or do the steps continue through in a similar way to Dead Cat Alley?

The view looking north from Masons Addition looks like it shows steps but it's not clear if they connect from the photos:

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1488954401663509&focus=photo

Why have you relocated demolished buildings?

You're using JOSM. If they're in the way just filter them.

That shoud ahve said "Traced building from imagery".

This is a private facility. There is no public access except to customers. Even if there were then it would be access=permissive, not foot=yes.

`foot=yes` indicates that everyone has the legal right to access a place on foot. This is a private jetty, there is no public access.

access=*

Replacing wrong tags with more wrong tagging is hardly an improvement. Map changes should be individually reviewed unless there has been previous discussion of the edit in line with the automated edits code of conduct. Transmuting nonsense into more nonsense helps no one.

osm.wiki/What%27s_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3F

Why would they be tagged with the default assumption for that wetland type?

They're mangroves tagged in outside of the coastline, how could they be anything other than salt water and tidal?

Please don't put building tags areas that aren't actual buildings.

You needed to create a changeset spanning three continents to add "a missing road segment"??