Didn't mean for these to end up in the same changeset. Sorry about that.

Are these really apartments for tourists or just the building names?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125207016

This changeset contains two entries for Nicole's beauty supplies in different buildings which is correct?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125286519

> Deleting my stuff without caring for anything i wrote because your principles are hurted

It's a bit rich calling this "your stuff" when you have lifted it from another site and don't appear to have even bothered to do the required license checks.

I think you may have put the street in the housenumber box by mistake here.

Cadastral parcels not used of course, surprised an overlay responding only with an error was included in the list.

Pleas save before editing in a completely different area, large bounding boxes can alert many people unnecessarily.

This also seems to have edited a state in Mexico, was that deliberate?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122627235

If possible please try to save between editing widely spaced areas. A large number of people can get notified with big bounding boxes if the bounding box crosses the area they pay attention to.

Is this currently active? If it is a current police station that people can go to rather than an old building that keeps the name then it should normally be tagged as amenity=police.

Should the names for these be put separately on the separate islands?
?

If these roads would still be potentially useful for runners or cyclists it may be good to keep the `abandoned:highway=unclassified` tags but also label them as `highway=footway`. Any physical barriers can be marked on nodes along the way.

barrier=*

I don't think OsmAnd will display liferings unless you specifically enable the POI overlay for "emergency" features. I'm not sure why.

I would think that if changing the classification of the road paralleling the shore it is more likely to be primary or secondary. With the lack of apparent bridges purely residential use is unlikely.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121108540

Are you sure these aren't there from a visit?
They shown on the MAXAR satellite view which is normally newer

Are there really two liferings that close to each other?

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Are these edits from local knowledge, survey or another source? The only thing mentioned in the changeset is Bing imagery.

Some of these additions also seem to have quite descriptive names, is this actually how they're named on the signs? osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

why?

The glass shop in Port Lucaya isn't a glazier. It sells glass sculptures. Please don't replace old tags with guesswork where they are ambiguous.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I notice you haven't provided a source for this edit, I assume it is mostly local knowledge?

I have refined a few of the outlines with some more up to date imagery (accessible with the 'B' key in the editor). For some reason the British Colonial Hilton wasn't showing up in the editor but was already in the database so I removed that duplicate. I expect it will be needing a new name soon following the recent news.

Let me know if you need any help or have any questions.