As you the comment indicates that this edit was for a tennis court I have updated the tag to show it as a tennis court rather than a park. If this is within a larger public facility that can be traced separately.

This is a live database used for realworld applications. It should not be used for tests.

Do you have a source for this name? the website linked indicates that it is for a different park.

Ongoing discussion here:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mini-roundabout/72751/57

Local knowledge is always welcome on OSM.

The OS maps have to be older than a certain date to be usable. There's guidance for the UK on the wiki but I'm not sure if crown copyright has a different duration in overseas territories.

Do you have any sources for this? The item you linked has associated wikipedia and wikidata.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140885606

Do you have any sources for this? The item you linked has associated wikipedia and wikidata.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/140885606

Why does a changeset that only mentions Tanzania also have edits in Canada?

Do you have a source for this name.

I think your correction to relation/16094983 has a mistake in it. Instead of `type=multipolygon` it shows as `type=Multipoligono`, which will not be correctly interpreted by software.

I think your new way is going across the Florida Straits rather than along them.

Do you have a copyright waiver for the source you've cited?

osm.wiki/Copyright#Proprietary_dataac

How big was this roundabout?

What is the actual source for this name change? I doubt it is bing as the changeset claims?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/139100976

** bonded

Please don't randomly assign tags for foreign entities just because they happen to look vaguely similar in name or operator.

Deleting the primary tags for the main healthcare facility in a town to satisfy a malfunctioning validator is reckless and borderline vandalism.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/131669434

This changeset contains an ATM in a lake, a fishmonger in a river, a pharmacy and bar in an area that looks undeveloped, and a theatre that's only accessible after miles of travel on unpaved tracks.

Are these meant to be tagged as other things? They look very suspicious to me.

1) It's a StreetComplete edit so it's almost certainly surveyed. I think the editor forgot to press upload before getting on a plane.
2) have a look in a proper editor like JOSM, this is two small areas either side of the Pacific.

See also: changeset/138152210

What is your source for way/1112536976 as the US embassy?

This does not match their website which continues to correspond to the existing embassy tagged over on Queen Street.

Non-standard is no necessarily bad.

osm.wiki/Any_tags_you_like