OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
106341318

Have you verified that this is not misspelled on the sign?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106341318

105535709

I think you may have misplaced the end of a pier here.

105110241

The old_name:en is rather dubious. No "North" mentioned: https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcript
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105110241

104032255

Do you have a source for this? I can't see it on the sources listed.

103235140

That link references Vietnam. This changeset seems a little larger?

102672041

Are you sure you have verified all of these on site? Some of them appear to be in vegetable patches or private residences in aerial imagery. Many of the names also look more like descriptions.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102672041

96499315

Hello, I notice that you appear to have added tag saying one of the school buildings (way/169240958) is 19 levels high. Was this a typo?

101840601

A marina is not a river, even with newer tags.

102097300

On what element does this data still exist?

102012187

You may want to check more up to date imagery like MAXAR Standard.

99851319

Hello,
I see that you have tried to undo much of this edit since making it. I have attempted to undo other parts that looked like they were probably mistakes. Sorry if I have undone anything that was actually intentional.

99406576

Connectivity looks OK to me.

99194105

Actually adding a building passage, forgot to update the changeset comment.

98821579

Hello, have you visited this? The causeway looks like it may have been washed out in a few places in the imagery.

98821772

Hello. Have you visited this? The satellite imagery looks like it might be `man_made=quay`.

man_made=quay

98304668

Please try to provide a changeset comment that's actually informative. Especially when the bounding box covers over half a dozen countries and territories.

97725966

The issues are well clarified in OSM guidelines where it says "Do not use data from copyrighted maps or any other proprietary data!" in bold text on the copyright page: osm.wiki/Copyright

97983086

This will probably confuse many people.

97725966

I think that probably still counts as copying as some of the well known copyright "traps" on maps include fictitious settlements and place names.

97725966

1993 is not old enough for the copyright to have expired. This would not be an acceptable source unless you have permission from the authors.

osm.wiki/Copyright