InsertUser's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 176163428 | 4 days ago | That shoud ahve said "Traced building from imagery". |
| 175858931 | 5 days ago | This is a private facility. There is no public access except to customers. Even if there were then it would be access=permissive, not foot=yes. |
| 175858982 | 5 days ago | `foot=yes` indicates that everyone has the legal right to access a place on foot. This is a private jetty, there is no public access. |
| 175595056 | 7 days ago | Replacing wrong tags with more wrong tagging is hardly an improvement. Map changes should be individually reviewed unless there has been previous discussion of the edit in line with the automated edits code of conduct. Transmuting nonsense into more nonsense helps no one. |
| 174346798 | about 1 month ago | Why would they be tagged with the default assumption for that wetland type? |
| 174346798 | about 2 months ago | They're mangroves tagged in outside of the coastline, how could they be anything other than salt water and tidal? |
| 173874623 | about 2 months ago | Please don't put building tags areas that aren't actual buildings. |
| 172968285 | 2 months ago | You needed to create a changeset spanning three continents to add "a missing road segment"?? |
| 173021435 | 2 months ago | Please save in between edits in completely different areas. |
| 172857276 | 3 months ago | Is this not `emergency:amenity=social_facility` + `emergency:social_facility=shelter` rather than `emergency:amenity=shelter`? |
| 172828877 | 3 months ago | Really? |
| 172812724 | 3 months ago | I don't have a strong opinion on this, but I do think this feature has much broader recognition than Null Island. |
| 172729076 | 3 months ago | I've struggled to tag facilities like these in the past. I think the most appropriate tag we currently have is `emergency:social_facility=shelter`. |