Where was the discussion for this mechanical edit?

It seems to be to match a rejected proposal.
osm.wiki/Proposal:Denomination%3Dlatter_day_saint

I have updated this to include the amenity=police tag to indicate that this is an active police station based on the name. Please delete the tag if it is actually abandoned.

Please save before moving on to another area as this makes it easier for others to check.

Do you have a source for this? The "scrub" areas look more like grass on the imagery.

There are lots of maps using OpenStreetMap data. Rendering differs from map to map.

Please save in between edits in widely spaced areas. Some people keep an eye on their local areas based on the bounding boxes of edits.

The inevitable collateral of this sort of blind find and delete edit is one of the main reasons for the longstanding policy against this sort of slapdash mechanical edits.

Here you took genuine edits by people trying to improve things and instead of manually reviewing them to see what the correct tagging might be you have just done a find and delete on edits using words you don't like.

There are reasons for the policy against this.

osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

node/6101995487 looks like it was a tourism=aquarium added by someone without enough OSM experience. to know the correct tag. Are you saying that all 1.4k aquariums in the database should be summarily deleted?

Also all 65k natural=cave_entrance? (6006695609)

Have you been to both of these places to make sure they don't exist on the ground?

Most of these appear to be entrances to tourist things, slightly mis-tagged, but how are they spam?

This change appears to have placed a doctors office at 0°N 0°W, rather than somewhere in Canada. I think this was probably a mistake?

Also Cuba and Costa Rica.

What is your source for the access tag?

What is your source for the speed limits?

Please save between adding/editing things in one area and editing in another.

Hello,
There is new Bing and Esri imagery of this marina now so I have tried to update it. If you have time it would be great if you could have a look to see if my updates are the way you remember it.
www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158477644
https://osmcha.org/changesets/158477644

Source?

What is your source for this edit?

To me the main difference between `reef` and `shoal` is that the shoals are normally loose material and so they tend to be a bit gentler.

The dramatic increase in the size of ships in the last century has stretched what might be considered a hazard to navigation, but I think in general the presence of shallows near shore is a thing to be generally expected and reflected in bathymetry (and proper non-OSM charts) rather than something to treated as individual features.

If it counts for anything most Bahamian near-shore areas would be more natural=shoal than reef and telling them apart on imagery can be very difficult.

Most of them are already within subsea=areas that the really big ships would tend to avoid.

As reefs are normally hard shallow areas that pose a hazard to boats I don't think an area encompassing a marina and several docks really qualifies.