Because I am adding tags. What is the reason for you comment or is it just to complain?

Awesome. If you are doing ground survey it is getting a bit soggy. I was going to place an image offset in the area. If you have a place you want one let me know

Yes I can’t say GPS works well in that area. If you find the data set unusable it should be removed. I think I would need to reach out the the DWG for that. Unless your can tell me how to delete the data set safely

This was a manual survey of the area a few years ago. Mostly gathered with a Trimble system. They might be off a bit as the terrain is difficult even with a local base. Heights of the poles are averaged. I wouldn’t say they are exact if that is what you are looking for.

Hi Mateusz, Your edit is correct. Unfortunately Doug is no longer part of the openstreetmap community.

This is a legitimate addition.

https://edmonton.ctvnews.ca/red-deer/central-alberta-family-transforms-old-school-into-brewery-1.5680374
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146840363

In your case would it work to use tclid? As that would be more correct than the loc_ref

Again it is not about winning. It is about conversation. In Canada we have NAV Canada AIP that is ICAO compliant. The question is about where to put this data. I inquired into your thoughts on the TCLID tag as well.

I agree with you on the IATA. I reverted the change as you seem to be doing a mechanical change that was not discussed.

Transport Canada uses numbers in some of the smaller airports. They are all listed in the CFS and ICAO recognizes these for flight planning and air traffic control as stated in the TC AIM document. I do agree with your use of a location tag. it is a little unclear in Canada if we should be using the tclid tag. I would like to hear your thoughts on the tclid tag. I do agree with your removal of the IATA code. I would prefer to leave the ICAO to match the CFS in Canada.

I see you are into constructive comments. These aren’t fake they are from the CFS published by transport Canada. Can you provide your source? I also asked where you discussed this mass modification. Can you provide me details where this was discussed? Also why are you not using the tclid tag that is used in Canada for transport Canada locations?

Not saying you are wrong in what you did just asking for clarification

Canada is a ICAO country and these airports are listened in the Canadian flight supplement as well as the transport Canada AIM.

Can you show me where this mass edit was discussed? And what the official list is that you decided to use ?

Not disagreeing with the need for this type of addition and I agree it makes it very visible in the name. I think it is very helpful. Two questions. One is adding the "LADD3" to the name changing the names from being searchable as it now has a different name. Two should we be adding this information to a frequency tag in addition to what you are doing?

Just wondering if the LADD3 channel should be added as a frequency tag over a road name

Verified to clear warning. Edit was made by a knowledgeable mapper with high level of local knowledge of the area
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118683928

Much appreciated. If you need any local verification or if you need any on ground data collection please let me know. The spirt of your changes are welcome additions.

Can you revert this change? I don't think it is a good approach for you to make massive changes like this only to leave it to locals to fix your mistakes. This change is very large and not always related to each other. It should have been broken into smaller change sets. I don't see the reasoning for you to leave this for others to fix

Breaside is also inaccurate. The city of Calgary provides a tool to verify speed limits.

https://www.calgary.ca/transportation/roads/traffic/traffic-safety-programs/residential-speed-limits.html

I have verified three roads Lake Bonavista Drive, Lake Bonaventure drive and Acadia Drive all have incorrect speed limits. This is a very large change set that appears to be inaccurate.

Residential speed limit changes in your area:

As of May 31, 2021, the speed limit along LAKE BONAVISTA DR SE at 1540 LAKE BONAVISTA DR SE will be 50 km/h.

Speed limit updates are not accurate.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118176561

That is awesome! Thanks for clarifying