Thx for the cooperation!

Hello, thank you!
I have added mtb:type=allmountain to the 5 "crosscountry" and =downhill to the 4 in the bike park.
There is one path that is accessible on foot in the bike park, it snakes a bit around the bike track. I uploaded it as way/1429227131#map=17/44.789825/6.944162

I think it is a bit weird the bike park tracks are now rendered as a "bicicle path" on OSM Carto, but that's a fault of OSM Carto, on OSMAND they still show as a path (black dashes) while a proper bike path is blue long dashes...

I have added the 5 randonnée routes, but could you check on the mtb:type (as the values are not properly described on mtb:type=* ) and other things on those routes? There is also some trajectory missing southeast of Valpreveyre of the route 55 (Grand tour de Gilly).

The routes are:
51 relation/19586576#map=15/44.80290/6.93779
52 relation/19586577
53 relation/19586578
54 relation/19586580
55 relation/19586579

Regards, IIVQ

Hi,

You are right about way/698922430, that is a track! I reversed it back into a track.

Als for the
way/698922430
way/1234133593, they are ski pistes that are in summer also possible to be walked upon, so I added highway=path. They are wide enough for a tractor, but not prepared for that, and also not prepared for MTB or (normal) cycles, as they are quite steep, but any MTB cyclist could do this route.

For the mountain bike routes here (see https://lequeyras.com/app/uploads/guillestrois-queyras/2025/07/Depliant-bike-park-2025-VF.pdf) , it's a bit complex, there is the "Bike Park" with the four routes, I tried to put them on the map, but I don't know the exact trajectory of the black D4.
Then there is also the bigger VTT de Montagne routes 51-55 (see page 2) but I didn't put those in yet.

Greetings, IIVQ

Maybe you should check before making implications. It is really a bridge, but quite new: https://plainecommune.fr/vie-du-territoire/actualites/detail/actualites/passerelle-pierre-larousse-le-tablier-est-pose/

Corrected in changeset changeset/169251638

No problem! I found it doing a big change from railway=preserved to railway:preserved=yes

Hello, you changed a lot of this line into railway=narrow_gauge, but as far as I know, it's normal gauge. I changed it to railway=rail!

Bonjour! Vous a changé quelques pieces de ce ligne de chemen de fer en railway=preserved. Ce tag est deprecé, maintenant on utilise railway:preserved=yes : railway:preserved=*
Je l'ai déja changé!
Cordialement, IIVQ

Dank je voor je reactie. Ik ben benieuwd naar hoe het wordt!