Accidentally marked as requesting review. This one has no need for review :-)

Thanks for catching that. I just updated again, removing the name.

Don't forget to resolve the note. note/4520979

Probably closed now/seasonal. Most golf courses close in Oct around there. Yes, 9-hole as well. I'll take a look at tags to update for adding some of that.

Thanks for the note. I did some searching and ended up taking the suggestion on the note. My search didn't turn up shop=new_age but I have just updated the map with it.

Awesome! Thank you. I'll be looking back at your edit for reference when something like this comes up again. Much appreciated.

Thanks for the input. Its good to hear from someone with a lot of edits. I'll take that in to consideration.

It doesn't outright say one way is correct over the other but I take the "One feature, one OSM element" good practice principle (osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element) to be if there is one occupant of a building, the tags should be added to the building. If multiple business occupy a building then it gets points for each occupant.

This explanation is also what I base that on: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/22962/should-i-use-pois-or-areas-to-identify-shops

Once you start looking at buildings, this can sometimes get a little grey. I think of buildings with a business below and unnamed apartments above. It gets a little odd to map.

Thanks again for the input :-)

Thanks for catching that and letting me know. They are both updated.