OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
181429464

Welcome to OSM. Thanks for editing. I stumbled across this edit and have a few questions. Is Zehpyr Hill an official name of the neighborhood. The boundary is overlapping different areas. In some cases neighborhoods have vague boundaries. Especially when they are not official (i.e. in the legal descriptions of property). In cases like that a node would be better to use. One other thing, name=* should be title case. Thanks! :-)

181344719

Some of these were not a resort. After looking at a couple, it looks like I must have accidentally undid something. I went through and fixed a couple.

181344719

Thanks for the catch on node/821819728. Updated. Also this was not a bot edit.

181387699

Sorry. I still do not understand what you are asking. All of the features in this changeset were nodes. So they cannot have something else inside them.

Are you trying to denote that all of the buildings in a place=* have nohousenumber=yes? If so, I believe nohousenumber=yes should be added to each building.

However, when I go to Pak Tin Pa Tsuen (node/3047962925) all of the buildings have addr:housenumbers. Maybe I am still on the wrong line of thinking.

181479518

Thanks for updating airports. Don't forget the leading zero (e.g. 01/19) when adding runway numbers. I added them for you on this runway. Have a good one!

181387699

Thanks for asking. Maybe I'm missing something. Why would a city or town (i.e. place=*) ever have a addr:housenumber=* assigned to it?

181375670

Mateusz, thanks for giving some useful feedback. I wonder if you use JOSM in a different language. Your comment about "JOSM begging you to state one" made me laugh a little. In English it is a light suggestion that is optional.

I will possibly revisit this later. Have a good day.

173894854

Hola! ¿Cuáles son los valores para name=*? Podría ser mejor usar osm.wiki/Tag:ref=. Avísame. Juntos podemos encontrar la mejor manera. Perdón si este español es malo. Fue hecho con Google Translate.

181375670

To avoid creating a mess of this discussion, I suggest you do a simple web search and look for the Facebook and Weebly.

Most features in this small changeset are well over 10 years old and started with tourism=resort. This was a simple change. Anyone in iD editor is prompted to make this change.

181375670

I viewed everything from satellite imagery and searched the internet for ones that were not obvious.

For node/6782247328, satellite imagery supports it. The info online that was not automatically aggregated also supported it.

181370435

Thanks for the heads up. Maybe I can get some feedback on changeset/181375670.

181375670

This was not a bot edit. What was "badly done" about this edit?

181370435

Thanks for checking.

Satellite view shows nothing that would make the water park (node/1433264893) a water park. Based on the name, the value was changed.

For beach resort, maybe I am misunderstanding the description in the wiki: "Use leisure=beach_resort to mark the boundary of a managed beach or part of a beach..." Until I read that I was thinking it would be a beach resort.

Thanks for your help.

179908888

If I remember right, these were outliers in a larger data set.

179908888

Hi, it was out of place compared to other surrounding features or it no longer applied.

178947319

Two new topics in the wiki discussion:

osm.wiki/Talk:Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Automated_edits_to_remove_leisure=pitch_+_sport=golf

178947319

Thanks for the help so far. I'll post on the wiki.

Depending on feedback, I can pull my changesets and manually revert if needed. While there were other fixes (e.g. typos) I should be able to key in on the main focus of each changeset and make the needed revert.

I appreciate the offer of help and I will take you up on it if I need it. I already feel bad for my misunderstanding. So I'll try to minimize additional impact on others for now :-)

Thanks again. I'll post the link to the discussion in the wiki shortly.

178947319

Hi, Glassman. Sorry for the confusion here. Regretfully, I mistook this for a blatant error. So I did not discuss first. I am waiting to make further edits, including reverting it, until I can get some input on the forums. There are a few other edits related to golf=* that are mentioned there as well. Your input would be greatly appreciated.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/golf-features-tagged-incorrectly-according-to-the-wiki-and-obscure-tags/141786

178603719

Nothing reliable came up in searching for "CTLM". Do those other maps show who the operator is? I assume CTLM is the name of a building or business?

178952027

You commented there already. In case anyone else has input on these tags that the wiki says not to use on golf=*, the link to a forum post is below with further explanation.

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/golf-features-tagged-incorrectly-according-to-the-wiki-and-obscure-tags/141786