Thank you for your contributions. They are helpful! :-)

I noticed a couple problems with this changeset. First it's unclear what Restore Hyper Wellness is. You set it as a retail landuse, but generally a retail landuse would be a large area containing many shops. Could you switch the preset to something more specific? Try searching with the editor's preset menu. If there's no appropriate preset, try searching at osm.wiki/ and if that fails, you can add a description to the object.

Also, you duplicated the other three places you added as both areas and points. Please only add one or the other.

Requested review: Thank you for your contributions. They are helpful! :-)

A couple issues I noticed: From how you mapped it, it's not clear what Dermatology Associates of York is, besides a building. Perhaps it's a doctors' office or clinic? You can switch it to a more specific preset by clicking "Building" at the top of the sidebar in the editor and using the search.

Also, regarding the York JCC, which you mapped in another changeset, it was already there as an area, but it was missing the name. You should have made changes to that instead to avoid duplication. I went ahead and merged the point you added with the area and made some fixes to the area, which had its own problems. Namely, I removed the building tag and mapped the building separately, and I expanded the outline to include a big chunk that was missing.
I've never been there, so I hope I got the outline right. Could you confirm whether way/539350813 now has the correct outline of the campus, and fix it or tell me if I got it wrong?

Thanks again. The rest of your edits so far seem great to me. I hope you stick around and keep mapping!

Hello,

Why did you delete the natural=water tag from several reservoirs?

Thank you for your contributions. It's nice to have more people working on the map. ☺ I hope you stick around and keep mapping.

The golf course area you added contains a school (and many residences, it looks like). That doesn't seem right. What were you trying to convey?

Thanks for your contributions; they are helpful. ☺

"Basketball Court" seems more like a descriptor than a name. If a feature doesn't have a name, it shouldn't have a name on OSM.

Fixed :-)

By the way, I looked at your other recent changesets, and I didn't notice any issues with them.

Requested review:

Thank you for your contributions; they are helpful. A couple issues with this changeset I noticed:

* Improperly formatted names: Generally abbreviations should be expanded, and only the first letter of each word should be capitalized. See osm.wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29 for more information. Somebody already corrected some of these, but "Springhouse BND" still needs expanding.

* way/544927744 Marking this as a tunnel is incorrect because the ways that cross it are already marked as a bridge. See tunnel=* (2nd paragraph) for more info.

It'd be great if you correct these; otherwise I can do it. I hope you stick around and keep mapping☺.

Hi I merged this back into the original relation in changeset/72748791 because it's really just one feature, and I didn't want to update both of the relations.

I appreciate it.

I undeleted it.

You were somewhat sloppy here. You tagged a pitcher's mound as a building and added a curve to the walkway.

I'm not even sure that the ways that you connected ought to be connected. I don't know whether you realized this when you made the changeset, but this is a loading dock, and the walkway is ~1.3 m higher than the western driveway and 0.6 m higher than the eastern driveway.

If you can figure out how to represent this (I can't), please do so. Otherwise, can you revert this changeset? Thanks in advance.

Hi. I noticed your new change to the Logan's Reserve boundary here. This is much better. With the boundary you drew earlier, Nominatim (and whatever other software there is that uses OSM to find the extent of Logan's Reserve) would have wrong information rather than, as you said earlier, a guess.

Also you deleted way/340768251/history . Was that a mistake?

Please don't do this. Boundary relations are for boundaries, and the relation you made bounds nothing. It seems akin to tagging for the renderer.