Reverted in changeset/139444467.

I just deleted the width=0, but I guess the question stands.

Hi!

When reviewing MapBuilder edits in Latvia, please be aware that Bing aerial here is low quality and offset.

See also changeset/136124455

Thanks

Hmm, tagad skaidrs kādam mērķis un ar kādu domu. Man likās tu varbūt gribēji atzīmēt, ka te trepes nobrukušas vai kaut kas tāds.

Ilgi domāju, neko neizdomāju. Bet teorētiski `smoothness` ir domāts transportam ar riteņiem - mašīna, motocikls, velo, skrejriteņi, ratiņkrēsls, utt. Tāpēc protams vajadzētu lietot standarta un atbilstošas vērtības, ne tikai no velo viedokļa. Lietot to vietās, kur kustība ar ritošiem transportlīdzekļiem nav paredzēta man šķiet bezjēdzīgi. Pasaulē īpaši daudz nav lietots kopā ar trepēm, bet ir lietots it kā atzīmējot gājējiem smoothness - cik tas pareizi, nezinu - wiki neko tādu neapraksta.

Nekad neatceros, kuram kādā valodā... haha

Skaidrs, paldies par precizējumu. Jā, tas tad pēdējo divu nedēļu laikā.

Tur TET maršruts iet vēl, drošvien būs jāmaina uz blakus ceļu kaut kad.

Hi (again),

I see you changed way/1190498907 back to a road. I surveyed this a couple weeks ago and due to the new construction there was no longer this second long way left and it no longer matched aerial. It looked more like ESRI aerial now. https://imgur.com/mDuab1g

Also, I wouldn't have put way/1193423365 as a path - it was easily passable by a wide vehicle before especially at the entrance, unless of course something changed very recently. https://imgur.com/qkQfISZ

My Mapillary hasn't processed yet, but I uploaded two photos for now to compare.

Hi!

Did you mean to add `smoothness=impassable` to steps way/420369145 ? Have they been destroyed or something?

Sveiki!

Vietās, kur nav oficiālas pārejas pāri dzelzceļam un nav nekādas fiziskas atšķirības (piemēram node/10994367462 ), nevajadzētu
likt `railway=crossing`, jo šeit nav
pārejas maršrutēšanas nozīmē. Liekot pāreju rodas priekšstats, ka šeit ir apzīmēta vai izbūvēta pārejas vieta.

Hi!

Could you please clarify where this road goes in the forest? way/1192581883 Is there some new construction here or a new location? Road classification is based on its purpose, so I retagged into a `highway=track` for now, since it looks like a deadend forest road.

Thanks

Hi!

I changed some classification here. `highway=track` should only be used when it's just land access - forests, meadows, rarely-used sideroads, etc. Roads that lead to properties and residences should be driveways. Public roads should be service roads or unclassified. Roads leading to parking and tourism access are usually service roads.

Hi!

Please use the driveway preset `highway=service` + `service=driveway` when adding roads that go to individual properties, rather than `highway=unclassified`, which is a generic public road.

service=driveway

osm.wiki/Lv:Latvian_tagging_guidelines#Piebraukšanas_ceļi_lauku_sētām

Thanks

Sveiki!

Gribēju pieminēt, ka surface=gravel OSM nozīmē parasti ir "lielizmēra grunts akmeņi". Tādi Latvijā ir reti kur. Parasti bezseguma ceļi (tā saucamie "grunts" ceļi/"grantenes") gandrīz vienmēr ir surface=compacted - surface=compacted

Īsti gravel ceļi izskatās šādi: https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/hellphoto?pKey=795381835143910&focus=photo

https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/358602-general/topic/V22

Oh whoops, I literally saw the other changeset changeset/138800929 after this. I assume you double-checked them.

Hello!

Are you sure it shouldn't be `route=foot` and not `route=hiking`, at least for those routes that imply unencumbered walking?

route=foot

Thanks for clarifying! I re-updated the roads.

Hi!

Could you clarify the source for the node/10096988863 name? I can't find anything online.

Thanks

note/3302672

https://osmlatvija.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/358602-general/topic/Ciems.20ar.20.22.28ciems.29.22

I surveyed the location and the signs are still for a segregated cycleway, so I changed it back.