I have "reverted" the Changeset as I do not have time now to address any changes due to personal matters. The changes that OSMUS wants will require two ways for the area in question, one for the "multipolygon for the boundary" and a separate one for the "boundary=forest_compartment" in this particular case. I could have "merged" the nodes for these two ways as they are identical to reduce the number of nodes. If you have time, you might want to see how you would handle this "conversion". You can send messages via this Changeset or via OSMUS Slack, "Harrison S". For more details on this "conversion", you can ask "Minh Nguyen", 1ec5.

In my opinion, all County Parks should use "boundary=protected_area" rather than "leisure=park" so the boundary is visible. There was a significant difference for the CPAD boundary but I didn't want to be the one changing the "leisure=park" tag for Manzanita County Park.