Hi, VIOLALIST.
Thank you for your mapping contribution.

While doing validation about MultiPolygon relation, i find that school buildings that belong to Multiploygon relation with id of 13373083 is mapped by sharing each other building nodes, and unfortunately it cause error "multipolygon outer way shares segment with other ring"

Due to my lack of local knowledge on this area, please allow me to ask some question :
1. Is the School building a single building or consists of several separated buildings?
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/13373083

2. Do you mind if i fix this issue by merge the separated buildings into one building as the outer member of relation and the field inside of the building as the inner member of relation? or do you have any other suggestions?

Feel free to provide any suggestion, it will be really aprreciated :)

Thank You, and Happy Mapping !

Hello gan_ven,

Thank you for your mapping contribution. I'm currently doing remote mapping to verify the Line Crossing Waterbody issue. I found this residential highway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/952602139) has crossing issue with existing waterbody.

I'd like to resolve this issue, but I don't have local knowledge in that area. So, I have to ask, is road that crossing the waterbody an embankment? Do you have any other suggestion to solve the issue?

I really appreciate any information you can provide.
Thank you, and Happy Mapping!

Hi, Lauretta_J.

Thank you for mapping contribution! Currently, I'm doing remote mapping to validate the existing rail network in Myanmar.

I need your help, especially with this railway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/648891140) that located in this coordinate (17.3911312, 95.359981).
I saw this railway was really short and almost close together with existing primary road, Due to my lack of local knowledge in that area, i'd like to know if it just accidentally made or it really does exist. Any information will be really helpful for validating purpose.

Thanks for your understanding, and Happy Mapping!

Hallo Aulia Ishmata,
Terima kasih sudah berkontribusi menambahkan data di OSM!
Saat ini saya sedang melakukan remote mapping untuk validasi jaringan kereta api yang ada di Indonesia.
saya membutuhkan bantuanmu terutama untuk rel kereta api ini (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/547538783)

Saya melihat pada history changeset kamu menambahkan tag "Layer=1" pada rel kereta api ini (-6.6618859, 108.4573523). Memang modifikasi yang kamu lakukan sudah cukup lama tapi apakah kamu tau kalau rel kereta api ini berada di atas permukaan tanah? atau ada informasi lain yang bisa kamu jelaskan?

saya sangat mengapresiasi apapun informasi yang kamu berikan.
Terima kasih

Hello bhar_gav.. your edit looks awesome, I'd like to inform that i found this highway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/474569735) has crossing issue with waterbody. Due to my lack of local knowledge in that area, can you help me to provide some information about that highway? is that highway that located on waterbody was a bridge, or maybe anything else?

if you have any other suggestion please let me know.

Thank You for your understanding, Happy Mapping

Thanks Peter for providing helpful information, it really help me to fix the issue.

Best regard,
Haris

Hi Beddhist, your edit looks awesome.. but i found this road https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/83068901 is having crossing issue with waterbody, so due to my lack of local knowledge in that area please allow me to ask some question to improve this
1. Is this road still existed?
2. How is the current condition of this road? is the road i mention is periodically prone to flood?

If you also find that mentioned road is prone to be flooded, may i ask you to add flood_prone tag in that road.

Thank you, Happy Mapping

Hi dlr,
Your edit looks awesome, i'd like to inform that i find this ways (tertiary road https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/341430790 and track road https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/257603873) are crossing each other.

Do you mind if i delete the track road i mention above? because based in any imagery, i find both of them have same geometry and causing crossing highways error.

Thanks for your understanding,
Happy Mapping

Hi usha shrestha,
Your edit looks awesome, but i'd like to inform that i find this way https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/874042425 and https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/874042426 is not properly added because from current imagery two ways that i mention above must be the same way with the existing tertiary road.

So i have to delete it,
Thanks for your understanding.

Happy Mapping

Hi cmoffroad,

I'm reviewing my work for the past 1 week, to reduce errors and warnings. Henceforth I will review per country.

Hi, JoeG.
Your edit looks awesome, but I need to inform that i found this highway https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/365160500 is not existed in any imagery,
So i have to delete it.

Thank you for your understanding,
Happy Mapping

Hi, Russ McD
You did great job. Due to highway connectivity issue on https://maproulette.org/challenge/30155/task/142918975 also based on Bing, Maxar and Esri Imagery, i found that this track road is not existed and not supposed to cross existing water canal.
So i have to delete it.

Thanks for your understanding.
Happy Mapping

Hi, laurabr

You did great job. Due to spiky building issue on https://maproulette.org/challenge/30237/task/142648409 and also based on Maxar, Bing, and Esri imagery, I found that this building is not existed.
So i have to delete it.
Thanks for your understanding.
Happy Mapping!

Hi, meichi!
You did great job.
Due to spiky building issue on https://maproulette.org/challenge/30235/task/142649100 also based on Maxar, Bing, and Esri Imagery i found that this object is vegetation, not a buiding. So i have to delete some of building you've added in this changeset.
Thanks for your understanding.
Happy Mapping !

Hello trimun, Hope you have a nice day

It seems that some of the building data in 100570993 changeset have invalid geometries, so I decided to remove some of them and add new building data to fix them.

Thank you.. Happy Mapping

Hello PrasadC, Hope you have a nice day

It seems that some of the building data in 105253922 changeset have invalid geometries, so I decided to remove some of them and add new building data to fix them.

Thank you.. Happy Mapping

Hello Kamna, Hope you have a nice day

It seems that some of the building data in 107801979 changeset have invalid geometries, so I decided to remove some of them and add new building data to fix them.

Thank you.. Happy Mapping

Hello Andrea Jane Miranda Lagarde, Have a nice day

It seems that some of the building data in the 93169626 changeset have invalid geometries, so I decided to remove some of them and add new building data to fix them.

Thank you Happy Mapping

Selamat pagi 046 Joni saputra

Saya telah memperbaiki beberapa data bangunan yang tumpang tindih pada changeset berikut, data bangunan telah saya "merge" dengan data existing. Untuk kedepannya sebelum menambahkan data mohon untuk mengecek terlebih dahulu apakah data yang hendak ditambahkan akan tumpang tindih dengan data existing yang telah ada sebelumnya.

Terimakasih
Happy Mapping

Hola Orózco, espero que tengas un buen día

Parece que la primera versión de esta relación (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/8002813) ya es correcta y tiene un miembro completo (desde, a través y hasta), ¿puede revertir sus conjuntos de cambios? para traer de vuelta la primera versión de esta relación? porque ahora detectó un error de miembro de relación faltante

Gracias