Gyrwa's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 80751590 | Fixed |
|
| 80751590 | Good catch Andy, it must have been intended for the scout hut to the south. |
|
| 152391200 | It is the east-west byway being marked as impassable that I was interested in. If it is passable for mountain bikes perhaps it should be changed back to "very_horrible"? |
|
| 152391200 | Are ways 25718486 and 1290321380 genuinly impassable? Some cycle routing engines won't route along such paths meaning the King Alfred's Way cannot be followed. |
|
| 150884580 | Thank you, fixed now. |
|
| 138036179 | Thank you for fixing that, I was trying out a new tool that must not be working properly.
|
|
| 116845109 | Hi Dave, thanks for fixing the platform. Is this UK station tagging documented anywhere? I was following the usage described in the wiki. public_transport=stop_area |
|
| 114171107 | Please have a read of UK road tagging guidelines osm.wiki/Roads_in_the_United_Kingdom. highway=trunk is for primary roads (green signs), which the A420 is.
|
|
| 111343516 | Reverting this changeset, it duplicates and triplicates existing ways with incorrect tags and adds a cycleway that doesn't exist.
|
|
| 111090969 | The tagging looks ok now according to waterway=weir
|
|
| 103083338 | I am using the prow_ref format suggested by https://osm.mathmos.net/prow/progress/oxon/ |
|
| 100452405 | This appears to be deliberate vandalism, I cannot verify the name of the allotment but I doubt it is "Simp Squad Gardens". Nor can I see why it would be paired with adding a single node to a track in Austria. |
|
| 44881022 | It was intended, I mapped the parallel footway/cycleway as seperate ways. I will look into the consensus on this to see if the ways around the station need redoing. |
|
| 38653970 | Its parish is upwell, it is "Upwell Isle FP1"
|