Hi Pete Owens, my mapping activity at the location solely involved modifications on way/1563658339, which was flagged for review due to being a very short road segment. No other changes that would affect the connectivity were made as part of my edit and the driveway did not exist at that time. You can review the changes in my changeset on https://osmcha.org/changesets/189768887.

However, you are correct on my unfamiliarity with the area and your description regarding the accessibility within the street is well understood and noted. Thank you for reaching out and letting me know.

Hi Allroads, thank you for the further explanation. We’ll keep in mind if we encounter similar short segments with unique attributes.
One point from my previous question is still unanswered: could you please share some more information or documentation about the driveway_link tag and how it differs from driveway? This would be helpful for us to understand the tagging correctly and apply it consistently in future edits.
All the best.

Hi Allroads, thank you for reverting the changeset. During my edit, I seem to have missed the different tags regarding the paving stones. I should not have combined the segments.
If you would be understanding about my curiosity, driveway link was not a tag that I knew. Checking from taginfo, I’m seeing more than 2K occurences mainly in the Netherlands, all added within this year. If there was a proposal, discussion, and documentation about it you can direct me to, I’d be extremely grateful to pass along with my colleagues. That way we would be aware of it on our editing tasks.
All the best.

Hi JassKurn, thank you for reverting the changeset based on your local knowledge, and thank you for reaching out to inquire the data sources used in the edit.
You can see the screenshot of the GPS Traces and GPS Speeds datasets I referred at the time at: https://github.com/tomtom-international/open-data/discussions/198
Please let me know if I had misinterpreted the construction activities as motor vehicle traffic. You will also see screenshots of the same layers for the past week, which I think indicates a partial opening of the road segments to traffic.
Can you please let me know of the most recent situation? If the GPS datasets of the past week are in agreement with the current situation, I can go ahead and update the area accordingly.
All the best.

Hi dmjab13,
I accidentally created orphan nodes in the USA, but I have now corrected the data. I’ll be more careful with my future edits to avoid such issues.

Hi dmjab13, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.

Hi dknelson9876, thank you for reaching out. Based on the resources available to me, I updated the roads where I could confidently determine that the construction had been completed and changed them to highway=residential. But it was accidental to remove the construction=* tags for the remaining.
For those, I don't have sufficient evidence to confirm their current status, so I wouldn’t make any assumptions. If you have additional information or more recent resources confirming their status, please feel free to update them, or let me know.
Thanks again for your message.

Hi kitto33, thank you for making the corrections and for your feedback . While updating the geometry, I seem to have misinterpreted the situation. I will be more careful in analyzing available resources in my future edits.

Hi dknelson9876, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.

Hi kitto33, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.

Hi adigis, thank you again for your message. I seem to have accidentally changed the oneway=-1 tag to oneway=yes without reversing the direction of the way. I have made the corrections. Please let me know if this was the issue you were referring to.

Hi adigis. While creating the dual carriageway, I seem to have accidentally assigned the same direction to both carriageways, resulting in a routing conflict. I have made the corrections.
Thank you again for your message.

Hi adigis, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.

Hi adigis, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.

Hi hlfan,
Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I misinterpreted the request and created a highway=construction feature on another segment that wasn't needed. I've since corrected the issue.

Hi hlfan, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.

Hi Till_btn, thank you for notifying me and bringing this to my attention. I missed to perform a full self-QC before uploading my changes. I have made the corrections based on your feedback, and I’ll ensure more thorough self-QC in the future before uploading my changes.

Hi user1572739,
Thank you for the additional information and sharing your local knowledge. I will keep this in mind and monitor future developments and available sources before making any further edits.

Hi user1572739, thank you for your communication. I made the edits according to the most recent GPS traces available to me to reflect the rerouting accurately. I will regularly monitor the situation and perform the necessary updates going forward as well.

Hi user1572739, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.