Thank you for the response. I will go ahead and add the oneway tag on the segment.

Hi mariotomo,
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. The edit was based on the divided highway in aerial imagery, but I am happy to adjust it if you are certain the oneway tag is correct. Thank you!

Thank you for explaining. The community consensus on lifecycle prefixes right now is that “proposed” is used for both planned and proposed construction, especially final plans with a high likelihood of being constructed. The “planned” key is not widely used, but I will defer to your judgment here and retain the “planned” tag you added. Thank you!

Thank you for your response. My understanding is that the proposed tag is for planned projects, rather than a planned tag, according to the OSM community consensus (proposed=*). Let me know if Bulgaria has a different community consensus documented anywhere for tagging planned construction. Thank you!

Hi Dimitar,
Thanks for the information. Based on OSM guideline, do you think highway=proposed and proposed=footway should be added to the crosswalks?

This edit was made using Maxar SecureWatch imagery, which is something we occasionally use in places where the Maxar layers in JOSM are out of date. We have an agreement with them, so we can’t share the imagery itself.

Hi, I added access values per my understanding of local editing standards, as seen with several gates nearby which have been tagged private or permissive. I apologize if this understanding was incorrect.

Thank you for commenting. Based on way/708682667, it looks like you have already added permissive tags. I was following your lead. I am curious if gates were recently added in locations you added to the map, as they are not currently present in available imagery.

Thank you for the clarification, I have changed it accordingly

The last link for the policy should be this instead.
osm.wiki/Conditional_restrictions

Hi mueschel,

It appears Eugenia highway (way/569716833) and Ramso Millan (way/4754716) change oneway direction between the time of 18:00-21:00 based these imageries:
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/oaJubEiP31nt9BNpEvYIbg

https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/BY1Xo6R566q2j1iXeX9iV7

https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/uILLxZNRMPjssbTYPADIWE

The proper way of tagging this is shown in the OSM conditional restriction policy at
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/oaJubEiP31nt9BNpEvYIbg

Let me know if you think this is incorrect.

Thanks for catching that mueschel. I changed the tag to a motor_vehicle=yes

Hi muralito, I used Maxar Premium Imagery. Esri also shows the painted oneway arrows on the ground.

I adjusted the classes of other small segments in this area, and see why I should not have changed the ways leading to the embankment. Thanks for cleaning up the junction.

Hello ЧикиБамБони . I noticed that here changeset/78141960 you have been adding new highways that are not supported by the sources you cited and do not exist in any aerial imageries. Is there a reason you are making these edits? OSM has best practices editors should follow here: osm.wiki/Good_practice. Thank you

Hi Map3787. I noticed that here way/173767676 you changed the number of lanes from 5 to 6. But arial imagery and https://openstreetcam.org/details/1382726/2117/track-info show that the road only has 5 lanes. Is there a reason you are adding an extra lane to multiple ways in Singapore? Here is the OSM Lanes wiki policy for lane counts: osm.wiki/Lanes. Thank you

Yes I’m working on some projects for Apple, and thanks for the invite to the Discord! I use street-level imagery from Mapillary and OpenStreetCam. I’ll go ahead and add the foot=yes and bicycle=yes tags to the motorway_links here. Thanks!

Hello sgmapperhh,

I have removed the tertiary you have added near Jurong West Street 64. This tertiary does not exist in any aerial imagery or Mapillary/OpenStreetCam.

Hello sgmapperhh,

I have removed the motorway_link you have added near Lornie Highway. This motorway_link does not exist in any aerial imagery or Mapillary/OpenStreetCam.

Hi sjevtic, thank you for reaching out. I set this road to primary because it connects major neighborhoods in the urban area of Belgrade. Additionally, the southern interchange is a central access point for various parts of the city.