If you want to add more you can use the OS OpenMap Local layer which has basic building outlines

When did this path route change? Because it doesn't match the September 2025 Esri imagery or Strava heatmap

Please note these are already tagged under highway_authority_ref so have been removed from the ref field

I've changed the bridge over the railway to a path (as it's a not a track) and also the bridge over the river to a pedestrian street (as it's basically a bollarded off road).

There were already some footway/path inconsistencies and I was also adding missing core path designations. So thought I'd try and be consistent with footway only for council adopted paths, because technically everything else is not just legally restricted to foot.

Hi welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. I've made a few changes - removed a couple of buildings and updated the landuse to add the name, etc.
Let me know if that looks correct.

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits.
If you go to to the background layers in the editor you can select the Esri World Imagery which has the most up to date satellite showing the new houses.
I've tidied up this area and added the buildings etc.
Feel free to add the house numbers and any paths etc

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits.
Just a tip when adding buildings, if you press Q it will "square" the area as some of the ones you added were slightly wonky! :) Also many of these buildings can be tagged with a more specific value such as building=garage (I've fixed most of them)

Hi, I've removed the campsite you added here: way/1465302628/history#map=18/57.274835/-6.082011&layers=N because of the note - just take care when adding things (I assume) without a survey :)

assume some of these are meant to be 20? https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/2svH

What is this? way/1500720753

better to be tagged as demolished:building :)

There is a discussion on note/5150062 about the route, which basically isn't signed on this west route - will Sustrans be going out to sign it?

Why have you changed these and other from dismount to yes, do they meet the criteria at: barrier=cycle%20barrier?uselang=en-GB#Standard_bicycle_access ?

Maybe shop=convenience would be better for "Shop Local"?

If the Tesco is not complete then the shop=supermarket should not yet be added :)

Thanks for going out and surveying this, I did have my suspicions as it wasn't publicised. Although, there was some traces on Strava heatmap.
I've commented on the original changeset to ask about their process.

Another mapper has surveyed this area and found the road is not open, see: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:New%20section%20of%20B9993.jpg?uselang=en-GB

I am curious how TomTom's GPS traces indicated this road was open. How many traces were there and did drivers report it as being open? What other evidence do you use before editing OSM?

Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. I'm assuming that the smoothness=intermediate tag is now outdated and it is likely to be excellent?

Still a couple of objects on the relation so not actually deleted. Though I wonder if it should be changed to a regional route for Falkland to Newburgh?