Will do, thank you. Sorry about that.

Hi,

It looks like a series of building in this area may have been digitized with incorrect shapes. Kindly review your edits in this area and make adjustments. Let me know if you need any help.

Hope to hear from you soon,
Jesspher

Hi UNGSC-Ihab,

Thanks for all of your contributions! I have noticed that way/936770871 may need to be added as a member of the 'Le Niger' water feature.

Hope to hear from you soon,
Jesspher

Hi Friendly_Ghost! I hope you are having a good day and thanks for all of your contributions to OSM :)

I just wanted to ask about your reasoning for removing the natural=water tag from the Lazy River relation (relation/9280311
)? Based on the natural=water tag wiki, it states, "Any inland body of water, from natural such as a lake or pond to artificial like a moat or canal."

Hope to hear from you soon,
Jess

Hi,
Thanks for all of your contributions to OSM! I hope you are having a good day :) I wanted to ask about this changeset since it looks like the changes may have unintentionally removed way/31005049 out of the map. There used to be a water polygon there, but it has been removed.

Hope to hear from you soon,
Jesspher

Hi mojoridin,

Thank you for all of your contributions to OSM :) I hope you are having a good day and I wanted to ask about one of your edits. It seems that you removed the feature way/23593117 from a golf course. May I know the reasoning behind the edit?

Hope to hear from you soon,
Jesspher

Hi DThos,

Thanks for all of your contributions to OSM :)
I came across this changeset and noticed that you removed the golf course. Your changeset comment says "laying out course" and im not sure what that means. Do you mind clarifying your reasoning?

Hope to hear back soon,
Jesspher

Hi BadEddiekit,

Thank you for your contributions to OSM :) It seems that driveways in this area were incorrectly tagged as buildings. Kindly update the geometries please and let me know if you need any help.

Hope to hear from you soon,
Jesspher

Hi Dipu0009,

I hope you are having a good day and thank you for all of your contributions to OSM :) I noticed that you've added water features in this area that doesn't seem to exist on Bing Imagery (your changeset imagery source). Do you happen to have local knowledge in the area? Here are some other features in question: way/846922532 and way/852154745.

Hope to hear from you soon,
Jesspher

Hi GBS Sidhu,

Thanks for all of your contributions to OSM :)
I hope you are having a good day. I was wondering what your reasoning is for removing the leisure=park for relation/3923973?

Hope to hear from you soon,
Jesspher

Hi AnToN42rus,

Thanks for all of your contributions to OSM! I noticed that a lot of the buildings in this changeset are rotated and does not match the imagery used based on your changeset information. Please kindly review the area to check for buildings that need adjustments. Let me know if my message is unclear and if there is anything else I can help with.

Regards,
Jesspher

Hi husam aldaoud,

Seems like these triangular buildings do not match any of the available imageries. Please fix or remove. You can also let me know if you have any more questions.

Regards,
Jesspher

Hi TryWahyudi,

Thank you for your contributions to OSM :) I am writing a changeset comment due to the overlapping buildings in this area. It seems like this is part of a group edit based on the hashtag on your changeset comment. Please let me know if theres anything I can do to help with the cleanup process of the duplicated buildings.

Regards,
Jesspher

Hi Ségolène Chaptal,

Thank you for all of your contributions to OSM. It seems like you may have added a profane word to way/791802195. Unless that is the building's actual name, I would recommend for you to please remove the profane name tag.

Thanks,
Jesspher

Hi Erick,

Hope you are having a wonderful day and thank you for all of your contributions to OSM! I am leaving a changeset comment to inquire about way/438014800. Seems like it doesn't exist on any of the aerial imagery and was wondering if you had any local knowledge about it. Hope to hear from you soon!

Regards,
Jesspher

Hi romarionkongho,

Hope all is well and thank you for all of your contributions to OSM! I am leaving a changeset comment to inquire about buildings that you digitized such as way/634441012. The buildings here doesn't seem to exist match based on any available aerial imagery. Please let me know if I can go ahead and remove these or if there is anything I am missing.

Regards,
Jesspher

Hi Diógenes de Sinope,

I hope all is well and thank you for all of your contributions to OSM! I am leaving a changeset comment to inquire about way: 225711426. It seems like the area may have been mistakenly tagged a building since it does not match based on aerial imagery. Please let me know if I can go ahead and make the adjustment or if I missed something.

Thanks,
Jesspher

Hi Luen,

Hope all is well and thanks for all of your OSM contributions! I am leaving a changeset comment to inquire about a building feature that you have added: way/639562733. This looks like it may have been added by accident since I do not see signs of it on aerial imagery. Please let me know if I am mistaken or if I can go ahead and remove it.

Thanks,
Jesspher

way/639562733

Hi contrujilloc,

Thank you for all of your contributions! I noticed that a lot of the buildings were tagged as waterway=dam such as way/743263201. I believe they should be tagged as building=yes. Please refer to building=*. Please let me know if you have any questions or need help fixing these!

Regards,
Jesspher

Hi Esmat,

Hi, I noticed that the geometry for way/584355055 looks like an unfilled polygon. I think it may be due to the waterway=canal tag. I believe this tag is mainly used for lines and not on polygons. I think the canal's geometry may have to be adjusted as a line or the tags modified to natural=water for the polygon to be filled. Thank you for your continued support for OSM. Hope to hear from you soon!

Thanks,
Jesspher