Thank you for having another look at the signs and fixing the tags. Merry Christmas!

Hi. I was looking at the intersection at osm.org/#map=19/40.58432/-124.25974. Are you sure these are give_way signs, not stop signs? On Bing imagery I can clearly see "stop" painted on the road here.

Deze parkeerplaats is toch ook voor bezoekers? Waarom heb je 'm op access=private gezet?

This is not "fixed". You wouldn't want downtown New York filled with tourism=attraction nodes for each film that was made there either, for the same reason.

If there is some physical object that is recognisable as something that is related to filming, like permanent props, you could map them, but this doesn't seem to be such a case, so it shouldn't be mapped.

If the name does not meet verifiability standards, then why should it be mapped at all?

Reverted in changeset/144484369

Hi. Do this name & tourism tag meet the ground truth principle?

I intended to split this up between Europe and North America, but I accidentally uploaded the edits in both areas at once.

Thank you, RedAuburn.

Don't listen to mcliquid. These guidelines are worthless bureaucracy that are designed to make simple spelling fixes impossible to execute. I doubt more than a handful of people have ever followed them to the letter.

Smaller bboxes also just lead to more complaints, country-sized bboxes aren't any less contentious than global ones. I tried this and people will just complain about the size again and they'll tell you to ask for discussions on their 3 different national communication channels.

Next time it would help to discuss the changes on the Tagging page of the forum first, like I did here: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/mass-edit-maxstay-tags-with-inconsistent-units/106155
That way, you reach plenty of people who can comment on the plans and you keep the discussion in a central place.

Happy mapping!

Oh wait, this was the area. Well, the traffic sign is already mapped explicitly, and the highway tag was wrong to begin with. I just didn't see what a description tag would add here.

Hi. We have better tags for that, like cyclestreet=yes or bicycle_road=yes, but that is not clear from this tagging. If you know which one, that would be helpful and then we can tag it properly.

Thank you for having a good look at this case.

I think addr:country should not be on boundary relations at all, because boundaries don't have addresses. is_in=* fits better in this context.

Hi Gengix. Are you sure the name "Lol" of node/11144027438 is correct?

The castle isn't a locality; it's a castle. The place in the addressing scheme can probably be better mapped as a separate object, either as a node or with the boundary ending somewhere near the road.

sorry for the big and awkward bbox. I already reverted my accidental deletion of relation/3651152.

Hello. Please write more informative changeset comments, so other mappers can get an idea of what you are editing. Please have a look at osm.wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments for the relevant guideline.

Please refrain from “disaster tourism” mapping like this. There’s no need for people from other parts of the world to race to be the first to translate their TV news into Gaza mapping.

Hello. I have reverted your changeset: changeset/143013572

Please do not engage in edit wars.

Gedaan: changeset/142457002

Hoi Leo. Op basis van welke bron heb je deze access tags toegevoegd?