reverted the vandalism

changeset/166264922

reverted the vandalism

changeset/166264922

Hi AndreaDFC,

Could you not add so many redundant tags to the roads, please?

Kind regards,

Casper

Hi. What does the aircraft:type tag indicate on the parking positions that you mapped?

If you look at aircraft:type=* , this is not what the tag is supposed to be used for.

Hi there!

Could you please write more meaningful / informative changeset comments to communicate with other mappers what you are mapping?

Hi there. Thank you for contributing to the map. Unfortunately I've had to undo a few of your edits, because some objects (mainly buildings) were dragged sideways in weird ways. Could you explain what you were attempting to do?

Kind regards,
Casper

You're welcome :)

Hi there and thank you for the kind response.

For this changeset I used Overpass to download landuse multipolygons with many members. I used regressions to also download everything that was attached to the members of those multipolygons. Then I cut up the multipolygons in JOSM mainly with the relation toolbox plugin and utilsplugin2.

Downloading everything that is attached to the relation members is important so you can safely edit the landuse multipolygons without interacting with other objects (roads, boundaries, other relations etc.) that are used as the edges of the multipolygons. Sometimes this still goes wrong when you reconstruct a natural=* multipolygon that uses a coastline or cliff as a member, because the natural=coastline/cliff may get retagged as a natural=wood/wetland/scrub/rock by JOSM's relation toolbox plugin.

I hope these tips can help you. If you need help with anything more specific you can send me a private message or find me hanging out in the OpenStreetMap World Discord server.

Hi there. Thanks for helping out with mapping this area. Could you please not attach street-side parking to the streets? Because that would imply that the parking areas go exactly to the centre lines of the streets, which is usually not the case.

Greetz,
Casper

Hi there. It looks like you mapped an unusual boundary relation on the hospital that you mapped. Hospitals should only be mapped as nodes or areas, so I have deleted the invalid relation.

Dan werken we precies tegen elkaar in, want ik maak van grasstroken landuse=gras, van weilanden landuse=meadow en van open graslanden in natuurgebieden natural=grassland. Dit is waarschijnlijk zo'n typisch thema binnen OSM waar we nooit een consensus over gaan bereiken. Zolang niemand bedenkt om hier een "edit war" over te gaan voeren ben ik niet van plan om hier moeilijk over te doen.

Hoi Peter. Grasstroken in het industriegebied zie ik niet als natural=grassland. Dat is een tag die ik eerder zou bewaren voor open grasvelden in bijv. natuurgebieden waar je ook groot wild tegen kunt komen. Hoe kijk jij daar tegenaan?

Hi. The waterway relations you mapped are not correct. A waterway relation is supposed to represent a single watercourse, not a collection of waterways.

Dankje voor de links. Ik krijg even mijn AHN-lagen in JOSM niet aan de praat, maar voor de goede orde heb ik mijn wijzigingen hier teruggedraaid in changeset/160010576.

Mocht ik nog eens de neiging krijgen om hier naar te kijken, dan zal ik me waarschijnlijk focussen op het verwijderen van stukken spoor die duidelijk niet meer bestaan, zoals in velden waar al tig jaar overheen is geploegd.

Fijn weekend :)

Hoi. Ik heb het niet met jou overlegd. Over welk veld heb je het hier?

Hi. I might have been a bit too rigorous with deleting the tags here. Others on the forum had suggested that this tag could go, so I simply went along with it.

Feel free to undo the deletion of the gnis:ftype tags if you know of an efficient way to do so, and otherwise I'll try to find some time to figure out a way that works.

Hoi A67. Dankje voor je wijziging. Ik wil je er wel even op wijzen dat we Youtube video's niet mogen gebruiken voor OSM. Op https://www.youtube.com/t/terms?sjid=6361050061228477017-EU staat namelijk het volgende: "U mag Content bekijken of luisteren voor uw persoonlijke, niet-commerciële gebruik."

Mappen op OSM valt onder commercieel gebruik, want OSM data mag voor commerciële doeleinden gebruikt worden.

I'm not in the mood to reply to all of that now. Convince the DWG that it should be mapped now and I'll let it be.

All of it is likely to change in the short term aftermath of the conflict. That is the reason.

I'm not getting into the politics of it. Go talk to the Israeli / Gaza community or the DWG.