Frank Peng's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 159098713 | 1 day ago | It's good practice to modify the geometry of the existing map elements instead of deleting them and redrawing them from scratch. This helps preserve the history on OSM. You deleted an existing golf hole and redrew it in this changeset: way/906570565/history You could have adjusted the position of the hole you deleted. In the future, please modify the geometry of existing golf features instead of deleting them and redrawing them from scratch. See the OSM Wiki article on "Keep the history": osm.wiki/Keep_the_history
|
| 166174708 | 1 day ago | Instead of deleting existing map elements and redrawing them from scratch, it's good practice to modify the geometry of the existing map elements. You deleted an existing fairway and redrew it in this changeset. Please modify the geometry of existing golf features instead of deleting them and redrawing them anew.
|
| 162838635 | 2 days ago | This changeset's comment should probably say "Added pedestrian crossings on Peppers Ferry Road" since you mapped pedestrian crossings in this changeset. Looking at this changeset's comment, Peppers Ferry Road is spelled without an apostrophe. There's no apostrophe in the street name. So instead of "Pepper's Ferry Road", it's spelled "Peppers Ferry Road" with no apostrophe.
|
| 162838587 | 2 days ago | Please click on the OSMCha link of this changeset at the bottom of this comment to see this changeset's map edits and find the existing sidewalks and pedestrian crossings you deleted in this changeset. You may have to login to OSMCha with your OpenStreetMap account to access OSMCha.
|
| 162838635 | 2 days ago | This changeset's comment should prabably say "Added pedestrian crossings on Peppers Ferry Road" since you mapped pedestrian crossings in this changeset. Looking at this changeset's comment, Peppers Ferry Road is spelled without an apostrophe. There's no apostrophe in the street name. So instead of "Pepper's Ferry Road", it's spelled "Peppers Ferry Road" with no apostrophe.
|
| 162838587 | 2 days ago | Please click on the OSMCha link of this changeset to see this changeset's map edits and find the existing sidewalks and pedestrian crossings you deleted in this changeset. You may have to login to OSMCha with your OpenStreetMap account to access OSMCha.
|
| 162838587 | 2 days ago | Please don't delete existing sidewalks, pedestrian crossings, and kerbs, and redraw them anew. Please just use the existing map elements and modify them. In this changeset, you deleted a few sidewalks and pedestrian crossings, and redrew them anew. You could've modified the geometry or refined the alignment of the existing sidewalks and pedestrian crossings you deleted in this changeset, and you could've started mapping the new sidewalks at the ends of the existing sidewalks. Please follow good practice on OSM by modifying existing map elements such as buildings, landuses, roads, sidewalks etc. instead of deleting them and redrawing them anew.
|
| 177560550 | 3 days ago | Please keep changesets to one geographical area. Changesets should not span multiple continents.
|
| 162268487 | 3 days ago | Please don't delete existing roads and redraw them anew. I see in this changeset that you deleted a few parking aisles and redrew them from scratch. Doing such things goes against good practice on OSM. It's better to just modify the geometry of the existing roads. In this changeset, you could've just modified the geometry of the existing parking aisles you deleted.
Also, I see that you merged a one-way section of a road going around and entering the USPS post office south parking lot and entering the parking lot behind the post office with its adjoining road (way/1137326523/history and way/1137326522/history). I can tell by local knowledge of this area that the road going around and leading to the post office south parking lot and leading to the parking lot behind the USPS post office is one-way.
|
| 177502946 | 3 days ago | Also, I left comments on a number of your changesets providing feedback on your map edits and asking for further information about your map edits, and you have not responded to them: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=9370870 Before you continue editing OSM, I would like for you to click on the link above in this comment to review the comments on your changesets and reply where they contain a question. Public communicaton is crucial to building trust with other mappers. Edits of users who never respond may be treated as less trustworthy. So when I or anybody comments on any of your changesets, you must almost always respond, even if your answer might be "I don't know" or you fixed the issues yourself. You should've recieved emails with comments made on your changesets.
|
| 177502946 | 3 days ago | You just added a residential area instead of adjusting existing landuse. And you adjusted some roads in this changeset.
|
| 165727645 | 4 days ago | Hello Aline, I'm not sure what you were trying to do here. You added a road name to an administrative boundary line. I don't know if it was intentional or not. Can you please explain if the addition of a road name to this administrative boundary line was intentional or not? Thanks.
|
| 164375253 | 4 days ago | Hello Aline, can you please provide the source(s) for the deletion of the tree nodes in this changeset? I have checked every available aerial imagery of this location in iD (up to the most recent) and I can clearly see the trees next to Beach Village Drive in aerial imagery. Thanks.
|
| 169455727 | 4 days ago | It would probably be better to wait for updated aerial imagery or check for any updated aerial imagery before mapping newly built roads.
|
| 176866869 | 4 days ago | I don't think there is a need to remove the oneway=no tag from East Cambridge Road. If there is no oneway=* tag on a road, then it is assumed that the road is not a one-way road, even though we can see in aerial imagery that this road is not one-way. It's a bi-directional road. I think it probably would've been better to leave the oneway=no tag on this road so it's known to anyone that this road is not one-way.
|
| 173929308 | 4 days ago | Changeset reverted because it glued several roads to a suburb boundary line and added a non-existent crossing
|
| 162229928 | 5 days ago | Please don't delete existing roads and redraw them anew. Doing such things is against good practice on OSM. You deleted a few parking aisles and redrew them in this changeset. It would have been better to just modify the geometry of the existing roads you deleted instead of deleting them and redrawing them anew.
You should go to the OSMCha link of this changeset at the bottom of this comment to see which roads you deleted and redrew in this changeset. (You may have to login to OSMCha with your OSM acount to see this changeset's edits on OSMCha.)
|
| 162222572 | 5 days ago | Please don't delete existing roads and redraw them anew. Doing such things is against good practice on OSM. You deleted several service roads, parking aisles, and drive-through roads, and redrew them in this changeset. It would have been better to just modify the geometry of the existing roads you deleted instead of deleting them and redrawing them anew.
You should go to the OSMCha link of this changeset at the bottom of this comment to see which roads you deleted and redrew in this changeset. (You may have to login to OSMCha with your OSM acount to see this changeset's edits on OSMCha.)
|
| 162200907 | 5 days ago | lanes=*
|
| 162200907 | 5 days ago | If you come across a tag you don't understand, click the info icon (the "i" icon) to the right of the tag, and the meaning of the tag and the link to the tag's OSM Wiki article will show up underneath the tag. In the future, please modify existing map elements instead of deleting them and redrawing them anew, and don't remove map elements you don't need or don't like. See the OSMCha link of this changeset at the bottom of this comment to see which map elements you added, modified, or deleted. (You may have to login to OSMCha with your OSM account to visit the link.)
|