Correction: This changeset was meant to be 3 separate changesets (1 in Taourirt, 2 in Nador) resolving highway issues. Instead, I left open the changeset submitted them all at once.

Hello Ayalaje and welcome to OSM. I have fixed three edits of yours where you removed a highway tag from Carretera México-Pachuca (way/773164885) and moved existing nodes far from their original locations (node/7285191385, node/6829083946). The "highway" tag is necessary to describe that the geometry is meant to describe a road (osm.wiki/Highways) and based on the other attributes on this way this is definitely meant to be a highway so I have restored the highway=trunk tag. Additionally, nodes are really easy to click and drag around in the iD web-based browser so I encourage caution while learning how the tool functions.

Practice and experience will help to avoid these issues in the future. The iD tutorial built into the tool is a great resource if you haven’t completed it yet. There’s also resources at LearnOSM (https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/). Additionally, OpenStreetMap has an extensive wiki resource which can be found here (osm.wiki/) and contains information for newer editors (osm.wiki/Beginners%27_guide). Hope this helps!

Traducción:
Hola Ayalaje y bienvenido a OSM. He corregido tres ediciones en las que eliminó una etiqueta de autopista de Carretera México-Pachuca (way/773164885) y movió los nodos existentes lejos de sus ubicaciones originales (osm.org /node/7285191385, node/6829083946). La etiqueta "highway" es necesaria para describir que la geometría está destinada a describir una carretera (osm.wiki/Highways) y en función de los otros atributos de esta manera definitivamente está destinada a ser una autopista así que han restaurado la etiqueta highway=trunk. Además, los nodos son realmente fáciles de hacer clic y arrastrar en el navegador iD basado en la web, por lo que recomiendo tener cuidado al aprender cómo funciona la herramienta.

La práctica y la experiencia ayudarán con estos problemas en el futuro. El tutorial de iD integrado en la herramienta es un gran recurso si aún no lo ha completado. También hay recursos en LearnOSM (https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/). Además, OpenStreetMap tiene un extenso recurso wiki que se puede encontrar aquí (osm.wiki/) y contiene información para editores más nuevos (osm.wiki/Beginners%27_guide). ¡Espero que esto ayude!

Hello DP24PH. I appreciate your advice and thank you for the kind words. I will keep this information in mind while working on pedestrian features in the area. Thank you for your help.

Hello Josh! Yes, a copy and paste function exists for both iD and JOSM editing tools (though use it sparingly). The buildings look great, just the one I noted stood out as being larger than the ESRI imagery showed in reality. Thanks for your contributions to the map!

Josh, overall these buildings look good. Just be careful when copying and pasting as they won't always fit what's seen in imagery (way/765522182). Also, a little more detail can be added as these aren't perfectly rectangular.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79875490

khotek, these buildings look great. Thanks for adding them.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79875265

sabribel, overall the buildings look good and thanks for adding them. However, don't forget to square your buildings (way/765520775).
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79875255

tsk1979, thanks for adding these buildings but don't forget to square them.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79875244

anotherglobe, please remember to square your buildings. Upon looking at Bing Imagery, this building is nearly all square angles and would benefit from the squaring function in iD or JOSM.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79875222

Kirthib, building looks good. Thanks for mapping!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79874938

eli-zun, overall buildings look good. For way/765519032 please don't connect buildings together unless you can confirm they share a wall.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79874905

Sabribel, thanks for adding this building. Overall location looks good, just know there is a rotation function in the iD editor which can help match the building even better to imagery.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79874568

Great job! Thanks for adding squared buildings. They look accurate based on Bing Imagery.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79874432

Hello, moon_walker is no longer on the team so I’ll respond for them in this case. Thank you for pointing out the maxheight tag. It appears a prior editor created the tag (changeset/47554080) and moon_walker copied it. However, it appears to be a mistake and I removed it.

Hello DemoLogin. The destinations were added based on the highway signs drivers see when driving through this junction. This follows OSM policy for the “destination” tag (destination=*) which states that highway destinations “describe the content of signposts or ground writing indicating the names of the locations that the tagged way is heading to”. I believe your information is based on the connecting road name, not the destinations. As an example, for way/8118064 (way/8118064) I used the destinations from this OpenStreetCam image (https://openstreetcam.org/details/994821/976/track-info).

Not sure what happened here, I will look over the area and remove the blank nodes. Thanks