OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
63607342 about 7 years ago

Nicely spotted, the sports centre indeed seems to be the only building to be re-used. I mistakingly deleted it too since people were also walking around on the top of it.

In a few weeks I'll have another go at this area.

While we're on the topic of re-use they were carrying upwards of a hundred of perfectly reuseable windows to the edge of another building and just throwing them into a container smashing them to pieces. Why isn't building material being re-used directly these days? It seems like such a waste...

36341104 almost 10 years ago

Thanks for the heads-up! =)

36340577 almost 10 years ago

This changeset is actually a fine example on why using inferred sidewalks (sidewalk=left/right/both) are not always as reliable and accurate as having a seperate path for them.
The roads in this area do not have the correct width defined and the sidewalks have varying distance to the center of the road - a visually imparied person following a sidewalk with an app needs these kinds of hints when the distance gets large (like in the bend of the road next to Soebakken 19).
Additionally the sidewalks interact with the park paths in ways that are more logically represented with seperate sidewalks - like close to Soeparken 36 where the sidewalk turns into a park path.