Hi Herr Bause, thank you for making the corrections and highlighting the tagging scheme for tram crossings. Noted on my end.

Hi Herr Bause, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you.

Hi toster234,
While combining the driveway connections, I realized TomTom proprietary GPS traces showed very recent vehicular activity. Thinking that the construction is completed, I removed the construction tags. Thanks a lot for the photos you provided, they are very helpful. I have made the corrections and reverted the construction status.

Based on the ground-level imagery, this junction cannot be classified as a mini_roundabout, as it is not traversable. And since there are yield signs, it can be identified as a roundabout. junction=roundabout also provides photographic examples to help editors decide. I suggest creating a circular polygon with a roundabout tag to accurately represent the traffic flow.

Hi René84828, thank you for reaching out. Since the centre island is traversable, I converted it to a mini roundabout, in accordance with the documentation on OSM Wiki (highway=mini_roundabout). Please let me know if you are thinking different, I’ll be happy to discuss.

Hi Tomas Straupis, thank you for reaching out and thank you for making the corrections. I have reviewed the discussion on K-modeling (osm.wiki/Talk:Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Connecting_ways_to_roadabouts) and this junction looks like it falls within that definition.

Hi Tomas Straupis, thank you for reaching out and thank you for making the corrections. I have reviewed the discussion on K-modeling (osm.wiki/Talk:Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Connecting_ways_to_roadabouts) and this junction looks like it falls within that definition.

Hi Tomas Straupis, thank you for reaching out and thank you for making the corrections. I have reviewed the discussion on K-modeling (osm.wiki/Talk:Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Connecting_ways_to_roadabouts) and this junction looks like it falls within that definition.

Glad to help, happy mapping

Hi Tomas Straupis, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you

Hi Tomas Straupis, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you

Hi Tomas Straupis, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you

Hi Mxdanger for pointing this out. I have made the corrections and I will be more aware of the member ordering in relations.

Hi mstrbrid, thanks again for reaching out. I had to review the situation as the changeset is over a year old. In this case, there are multiple traffic calming features, which at the time I interpreted as physical barriers. I see you already made changes in the map, so I'll hold off making any reversions.

Hi mstrbrid, Thank you for your feedback. I will analyze the situation and come back to you

Hi Supaplex, thank you for reverting the changeset. While I have referred the wiki for information on classification based on shields, during the reevaluation of my changes I also found the dedicated note about The Zhongshan Elevated Road. I have included this information in our knowledge base for future edits.

Hi mikefalzon,
Thank you for your feedback, I have made the corrections.

Hi mikefalzon , Thank you for feedback. I will analyze situation and get back to you.

Hi ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy I interpreted the signs in the ground imagery to indicate that a HOV lane existed here. However, after receiving your comment I reassessed and realized that this was not the case so thank you for making the corrections.

Hi Baloo Uriza,

Thank you for making the corrections. I had removed the duplicate barrier and then added motor_vehicle=yes to the barrier which I now realize with your feedback was not necessary. I'll be more careful working on access/permissive tags to avoid making the same mistake again.