FDMS4's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 164061672 | Thank you! (Just in case you're curious, you seem to have forgotten one single small piece of grass near the Türkenschanzplatz entrance, I changed that one as well just now :) ) |
|
| 164061672 | There is no agriculture here, so meadow seems inappropriate. The more appropriate approach would probably be to set the park surface to grass, draw areas for the paths, and remove all the meadow areas? |
|
| 186488003 | Danke! |
|
| 185356192 | Oh and I'd just remove public_transport entirely |
|
| 185356192 | Going strictly by what's otg for infrastructure-related 'railway' tags, I'd say it's a station like any other, i.e. no need for a prefix at all. |
|
| 186488003 | Voilà: https://www.wienerlinien.at/ogd_realtime/doku/ogd/gtfs/routes.txt |
|
| 185356192 | I have some doubts disused i.e. no longer used (osmwiki) accurately reflects the current state of the station and its platforms :) |
|
| 184700809 | Jftr, as indicated by the source, all changes were based on actual path alignments observed otg. |
|
| 188299473 | Re the factory, I don't think the presence of signage is the sole deciding factor, as long as there's a name it's referred to in English? Re train stations, any idea why NKZhl and BDZ to this day (including in their electronic timetables) use some transliterations that are different from the common/legal place ones? E.g. here on the official website: https://www.rail-infra.bg/assets/images/zoom_map_en.svg Regardless of transliteration accuracy, in case of inaccurate transliterations please change name:en – if present – to the correct one rather than remove it entirely. |
|
| 188299473 | In this case I was asking about Rodopska takan. Re train stations, the different (current) transliterations used by BDZ and the infrastructure operator for the stations vs official/common ones for the places themselves are a bit strange – signage otg doesn't always seem to use identical transliterations, I suppose depending on when it was erected. My understanding is that Bulgaria-specific guidelines suggest using int_name (which most data consumers and editors seem to handle not well or not at all), but leave open the possibility to have name:en as well (including when identical to int_name). |
|
| 188299473 | Side note: I have restored name:en at node/12078070779 since according to the wiki name:en is not the same as int_name, and can be present in addition to it |
|
| 188299473 | Hi, why the name:en removal? |
|
| 184700737 | You yourself eventually changed the surface tag to ground rather than grass. I didn't walk the entirety of the path in question, I could only tell that grass was inaccurate – which you yourself confirmed by tagging it as ground –, hence the removal. |
|
| 184700737 | Okay so I did read the linked threads just now and the heart of the issue seems to be that the user who started this cs discussion readily accused me of being unfamiliar with how tagging works due to them simply being unaware of the situation otg and just by default assuming the change must be wrong despite the cs being tagged as source=survey? Can I just ask that said user refrains from throwing out such accusations without checking the otg situation first – they really don't create a welcoming environment |
|
| 184700737 | Hi, just chiming in to say that I had no idea about the history of that particular path/area/user and their tagging, I just came across the path while hiking past it and noticed its tagging wasn't in line with the rest of the area and what I'm used to. Not sure where I'd upload it and I'd need to look for it in my archives, but I think I also have a photo of the (narrow) path in question. |
|
| 186488003 | Oh, die Schriftfarbe hatte ich übersehen, die beschriebenen Abweichungen zwischen WienMobil Web und Onlinenetzplan gebe ich mal weiter. Printprodukte sind oft in CMYK gesetzt, die Farben sind dann zwangsläufig geringfügig abweichend da CMYK nicht 1:1 in RGB umgewandelt werden kann. |
|
| 186733137 | Absorb not absurd, ugh |
|
| 186328771 | Ja, sind nur wirklich minimale Abweichungen. Die Werte sind bspw. beim Öffnen des Gesamtnetzplans mit Adobe Illustrator oder bei Verwendung des Web Inspectors auf https://wienmobil.at erhältlich |
|
| 186488003 | Ah, sehe gerade Strab ist etwas stärker abweichend, habe mal im dortigen CS nachgefragt changeset/186328771 |
|
| 186328771 | Hallo, nur aus Interesse, woher genau kommen die Farbwerte? Die WL verwenden z.B. in Online-Netzplänen und WienMobil Web an sich #C00808 für Strab und #0A295D für Bus/Nightline |