Thank you for the feedback. This was a one-time test upload to evaluate data behavior before finalizing my documentation.

I will incorporate your suggestions, including exploring "diameter_crown" and researching a better approach for canopy and wood density. I will post a formal draft for community discussion on the forums soon. In the meantime, I agree with keeping these specific estimates in a „note“ tag. Thanks for the guidance.

Hi! I’m the developer of the tool that generated these tags. I used structured est:* keys to keep the data machine-readable for analysis. I’m currently drafting the WeeklyOSM Article and a Wiki documentation to formalize the tags. Would you be open to restoring the individual tags once the documentation is live?