Thank you for your kind words, and happy mapping!

Hello LockOnGuy;
Thank you for your quick reply, I totally agree with your points, I just updated this segment not to make the routing in this location floating
Here is a changeset: changeset/155784240.
Regards

Hello LockOnGuy;
Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap in Iraq,
I noticed you removed a link
Link for the deleted link :
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1283592495
and made the road "Dead-end"
Link for this street that will be dead-end:
way/1205479837
Could you please provide us with the source you used to remove this link and check this issue?
Regard
Eman Ghareeb

شكرا لك اخ نواف- وشكرا ل مساهمتك في تحسين خريطة العراق.

مرحبا اخ نوفل
شكرا لك علي ملاحظة ذلك و علي استرجاع البيانات نظرا لمعرفتك المحلية!
ولكن يوجد بعض النقاط يجب اخذها في الاعتبار في الخطوات القادمة.
اولا في التغيرات الاتية : changeset/154952028
لقد قمت بكتابة تعليق باضافة نقطة ف ماذا تعني نقطة هل التعديل الذي قمت به نقطة
من سياسة osm توضيح الاجراءات و التعديلات التي تمت من خلالك لجعل شبكة التواصل علي osm تعرف ماذا تم من خلالك.
ايضا لم توضح المصدر الذي استخدمتة في تعديلات هذه البيانات.
شئ اخر من ساسية osm انتظار الرد من الشخص الاخر بدلا من عمل revert و يجب معرفة سبب التعديلات التي قام بها قبل عمل استرجاع التعديلات من جهتي قمت بالتعديل بالاعتماد الي الصور الفضائية المتاحة ولو انك كنت تذكر في التغيرات التي قمت بها انها من خلال معرفتك المحلية ما تم من خلالي تعديل اي شئ
شكرا لك.

Hi desertivy;
I agree with your point, and next time please read the source in the changeset for any mapper, to save the edits and efforts they made to make OpenStreetMap more accurate.
Happy Mapping!
Regards
Eman Ghareeb

Hello LockOnGuy,
Thank you so much for your comment I appreciate it.
Hi desertivy,
As you mentioned you removed a road that you didn't see, but in this case, you should take a look at the source that we used in our changeset set, In addition, we occasionally use Maxar’s most recent nonpublic imagery for updates in OpenStreetMap. We always prioritize the use of public imagery, but at some locations where new changes are not seen in public imagery options, we will use Maxar’s nonpublic imagery to ensure the map is up to date.
As we mention in our main page in Wiki OSM :
osm.wiki/DigitalEgypt
Here is a wiki page that might be helpful for you:
osm.wiki/Changeset
Regards
Eman Ghareeb

Hello Ahmad-0772;
Thank you for reaching out,
Unfortunately, the satellite image is still as "Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2023-11-21", from our side we will keep tracking this image and we will make the necessary update when the new imagery available.
We appreciate it if you near this location if you could upload a new mapillary and we will make the necessary update.
Regards
Eman Ghareeb

Thank you!

Hello BC Norwich;
We checked this bridge,
Indeed, there was a bridge on Al Jawf Road, but the Ford is on the construction road (way/1254370301).
Based on Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2023-07-31.
So, I updated it accordingly.
Please check this link:
https://dev.overpass-api.de/achavi/index.html?changeset=147883542
Regards
Eman Ghareeb

Hello BC Norwich;
I fixed these issues.
Please check these links:
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1253207914
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/154265995
Regards
Eman Ghareeb

Hello BC Norwich;
I fixed this issue.
Please check this link:
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1253207911
Regards
Eman Ghareeb

Thank you!

Hello Lamassu,
I noticed you turned the classification for both roads from propose to construction
way/1151131116
way/1150599079
According to the rules for OpenStreetMaps,
highway=proposed
proposed=*
The proposed tag may be used for any road, railway, or route that is in the planning phase.
And it is more suitable to use "proposed" as an overview of this location Based on Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2023-11-24
The official group for the Iraqi OSM community, and the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City of Baghdad.
http://www.khatibalami.com/Portfolio/Projects/ArchitecturePlanning/CityRegionalPlanning/BaghdadComprehensiveCityDev_Iraq/Pic1Large.jpg
Could you check it, please?
Regards
Eman Ghareeb

Hello UUU eb;
I noticed you have reverted my edits and operated some streets
For examples
way/1209002820
way/1216646213
way/1216646214
and I mentioned in my source that I used "Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2023-10-16"
and these streets are still under construction.
Could you please provide us with the source that you used?
Regards
Eman Ghareeb

. شكرا لك

. شكرا لك

Hello Mateusz Konieczny;
Thank you for reaching out, this street is connected between many hamlets starting from node/330514595
to
node/6200201227
Also, the classification before was "highway=road" and our colleague updated the classification to match the surrounding streets in this area.
Regards
Eman Ghareeb

Hello فارس المردي;
We've seen that you've modified the classification to make it unfit for some streets.
Here are some examples of streets:
way/1193300357
way/1202074341
Changeset:
https://dev.overpass-api.de/achavi/index.html?changeset=140387836
And before that, you modified the classification and added another layer and bridge, which I fixed at achavi:
https://dev.overpass-api.de/achavi/index.html?changeset=140619878
https://dev.overpass-api.de/achavi/index.html?changeset=140439426
For additional information on how to utilize the highway categorization on OpenStreetMap, see highway=*.
I've now resolved all of these issues.
Regards,
Eman Ghareeb

Hello Renas Azad;
Thank you for your kind words.
Please Check the source I used to add this link in my changeset "Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2023-04-03",
Also Our team and Maxar have an agreement that allows us to use Maxar’s most recent nonpublic imagery for updates in OpenStreetMap.
We always prioritize the use of public imageries, but at some locations where new changes are not seen in public imagery options,
we will use Maxar’s nonpublic imagery to ensure the map is up to date.
Regards
Eman Ghareeb