halo Irfan_Muriy,
saya bantu menjawab ya,
untuk area PDAM dapat di beli tag landuse=industrial.
instalasi pengolahan air minum di dalam area PDAM dalam diberi tag man_made=water_works(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dwater_works)
sedangkan bak penampungan airnya dapat diberi tag man_made=reservoir_covered (man_made=reservoir_covered) dan dapat diberi informasi tambahan capasitas dengan tag capacity=* dengan satuan meter kubik.

Halo w_djatmiko,
Terima kasih sudah berkontribusi menambahkan data di OSM!
Saat ini saya sedang melakukan remote mapping untuk update nama desa di provinsi jawa tengah dengan menggunakan data nama desa terbaru dari BIG.
Saya ingin mengkonfirmasi terkait changset anda yaitu: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/1308656312
anda menghapus Desa Sukolilan
dan pada changeset https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/10945918098
anda membuat Desa Sukolilan Satu.

Berdasarkan data BIG (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KMTOFCo8h3yxq7YwIwHrZk3chel-8ZNC/view), Desa Sukolilan satu tidak ada, namun adanya Desa Sukolilan.
apakah anda memiliki sumberlain yang lebih valid mengenai penamaan desa tersebut?

saya sangat mengapresiasi apapun informasi yang kamu berikan.
Terima kasih

Hi vietnam321,
I'm doing a validation of the Maproulette road name gap check (https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/30221) and I see that you did some road name updates, but sometimes it makes the road names inconsistent.
like on this road https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/296422008, you changed the name from Trần Nhân Tông to Lý Thái Tổ which caused 1 segment of the road to have 2 different road names.
I want to confirm if your street name changes are the latest official names.

thank you

Hi ZioDragon,
thanks for your mapping contribution.

I'd like to confirm the motorway name changeset (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1036712001).
You made "Đường cao tốc Nội Bài - Hạ Long" and then changed it to "Đường cao tốc vành đai 4", which makes the right and left sides different.
However, I discovered on vietbando (http://maps.vietbando.com/maps/?t=1&st=0&sk=21.2115922,+105.9273573&l=18&kv=21.2094766,105.933909) that the motorway is "Cao tốc Nội Bài - Hạ Long"

I believe you are a local mapper with the necessary knowledge to resolve the issue. Which name is appropriate for that segment? could you give me any further information?

thank you

ok, thank you Johannes M

Hi Johannes M, Thank you for providing this information.
I agree that we can include intermittent=yes because this is an area without permanent flow, but I'm not sure if we should include natural=shingle and natural wetland areas because, as you mentioned, the surrounding area still uses water=river.

What do you think about combining intermittent=yes with water=river and adding ford to all highways that cross this river? Because I noticed in taginfo (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/ford#combinations) that the combination ford and intermittent is common to us.

Do you have any recommendations?

Maybe the tag he meant earlier was hazard_prone (hazard_prone=*).
thank you

hi Andy,
after looking at the link, I found that it was Ana Ibrahim who tagged "M:hazard_prone". Maybe you can ask him about the tag.
thank you

hi SomeoneElse,
would you like to drop an id way/node or maybe a pewu link about the object that you mean? because I never used the M:hazard_prone tag before.
thank you

Hi Dhital Bhimsen,
thank you for your mapping contribution, It looks like you added the highway=path tag to the cable object with the changeset local knowledge comment and it's causing lots of warning crossings. (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/341470430)
please remove the highway=path tag, if the object is not a path but a cable
thank you, happy mapping!

Hi Frans S,
Thanks for the review,
I've already fixed the warning issues in this changeset.
Thank you

Hi Frans S,
Thanks for the review,
I have already fixed the warning issues in this changeset.
thank you

hi wbutc1008,
I've adjusted a secondary highway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/497334420) based on Maxar Premium Imagery. because there seems to be some update in that Imagery.

thank you, happy mapping!

Hola, Facalderonm
espero que estés bien

ID de relación: 6989951 (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/6989951) está marcado como restricción de turno, pero no está bien formado. Falta un miembro "de" y "a". gracias

Olá BJJr
Este objeto de corpo d'água (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/889968814) se sobrepõe a outros corpos d'água que foram criados anteriormente.

você consertaria isso? deixe-me saber se houver alguma atualização de dados. obrigada

Olá ProjetoJosm,
Excluí o corpo d'água (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/769388699) porque ele não está relacionado às imagens Maxar Premium.
e Maxar Premium Imagery é mais atualizado do que Bing Imagery nesta área. obrigado

Olá ricardopretto,
esta área (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/682320104) foi marcada como building=yes, então ela se torna um cruzamento com o objeto de corpo de água nela.(https://maproulette.org/challenge/17412/task/97102218)

Este objeto é um centro esportivo? em caso afirmativo, posso alterar a tag building=yes para leisure=sport_center?
obrigado

Olá Prauso1,
isso é realmente um reservatório?(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/941466878) porque cruza com edifícios e estradas.
(https://maproulette.org/challenge/17412/task/97107528)
parece impossível que um reservatório esteja no meio de uma área residencial.

você se importaria de consertar? deixe-me saber se houver dados de atualização. obrigado

Olá C210,
Esta é uma área de objeto ou edifício?(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/931752805) porque cruza com um corpo de água dentro do objeto.(https://maproulette.org/challenge/17412/task/97104459)

você se importaria de consertá-lo? deixe-me saber se houver dados de atualização. Obrigada

Hi LucFreitas,
A waterway (809188266) (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/809188266) has crossed with the highway (279673874). is there a tunnel there?
thank you