Small roads in villages should not be classified as Secondary and in most cases not even Tertiary.

The Indonesian classification of roads already allows smaller roads to be classified bigger than in the rest of the world:
osm.wiki/Id:Jalan

Some of your changes definitively don’t classify for Secondary:
"Jalan yang menghubungkan secara efisien antar pusat kegiatan wilayah atau menghubungkan antara pusat kegiatan wilayah dengan pusat kegiatan lokal”

They don’t connect regional centres and are also not efficient.

Thank you.

Thank you 🙏🏼

It’s my friends business and I don’t seem to be able to enter opening hours.
They are every day from 13:00 till 21:00

Kalau saya gambar jalur yang bisa pakai kenderaan 2 roda saya kasih tag “path”

Kalau saya dapat jalur yang hanya bisa dengan jalan kaki saya kasih tag “footway”

Ini benar dan bantu keamanan orang yang pakai routing. Jadi, mereka tidak berakhir di jalur yang tidak bisa dilalui dengan sepeda.

Setahu saya ini jalur mendaki dan bukan untuk sepeda.
Ini adalah route pendaki dari Borobudur Highland glamping.

Kalau kamu tahu di mana ada track untuk sepeda gunung, silakan ganti saja ke “path”

Hi Guido,
Strange, some streets got moved. Probably by accident.
I think I fixed it now…
Greetings from Sulawesi

Hi Sha_lini,
In my understanding there are way too many roads marked as residential in that area that should be unclassified.
In my understanding "residential" is the right category for streets that are mainly not used to pass tru, have speed bumps or so. I hope you agree with me?
I use "unclassified" for roads connecting settlements. Unfortunately I don't have the resources to change all wrongly categorized roads.

I absolutely agree I should have used the "link" feature for those intersections! Will be more careful in the future.

Thank you for having a look at my changes, I always appreciate comments!