Hi Planemad. Is way/45248331 wrong or why was it deleted?

Welcome to OSM!

Please rectify your buildings (key "Q" in JOSM), they look not very accurate:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=68130381

And please don't let you stop by critics like me, everybody starts small.

This was already broken before my change: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=64854851

Bonjour Olyon, have you noticed that there already have been features like way/162095761/history which are now overlayed with the BD TOPO Hydrographie? This redundancy looks very ugly at some places.

Is this an automatic edit?

Shouldn't it be possible to associate buildings with their address nodes through relations?

Why are you not keeping both address nodes and ways in Denmark? It would be hugely beneficial to have address data at the buildings.

You don't have to write a long sentence, but a little bit more details would be great.w

Because you should write this down instead of '-'. 'Road alignment' seems not too long for me. Greetings

What have you mapped here?

Even minor edits deserve a qualified changeset comment. May you please change this (in future)?

Hi WJtW,

at way/197532513/history something went broken!

I think assuming that "snow-covered in winter" means landcover=tundra at relation/5985104 is not reliable enough. What are you planning?

On which imagery have you seen [this "greenfield"](way/569140698) ?

Hi Cheweyocioso,

what you've mapped is not the dam, but the reservoir. So please change the tag from "waterway=dam" to "landuse=reservoir"!

Lo que ha mapeado no es la presa, sino el embalse.
¡Por favor, cambie la etiqueta de "waterway=dam" a "landuse=reservoir"!

Greetings

Hallo toolted,

sind die XTRID-Nodes Vermessungspunkte?