If I remember correctly, this was mainly just a bunch of tag errors that anyone could have checked and fixed. Honestly, some of the "outdated tags" should just get automatically fixed by the system, such as unmarked crossings.

I was just doing what the system thought the tags should be changed to. I live in California, so someone who lives in the area, like you presumably do, can change it.

Whatever, man. Do whatever you want in this area, since you probably live nearby and I don't. I just don't like seeing errors and I feel compelled to deal with errors, but sometimes I have to stop myself or I'll never stop. No more replies or I'll unsubscribe. I do not care anymore.

All right, then change them. But we can't have people drawing paths over creeks without specifying how they interact at all.

I'm going to ignore you and let you, one who is likely a New York native with better access to research such a thing, handle that. Fine. If you must know, I saw the name on another map.

Maybe I'll just avoid editing things in the big cities.

Whatever.

With the huge population of San Francisco and Oakland, any edits I make in this area are leagues more likely to get noticed than edits I made in less-populated areas. With more dense content, however, also comes more errors that exist because of other people who don't set tags correctly to begin with.

No. Just scroll down a little bit. What I added should finish showing up at all zoom levels in a few days. An octagon building, a pool, an undrawn parking lane, categorization of a building that is an apartment building as ACTUALLY an apartment building instead of a generic building, and the right turn from E Remington Dr to E El Camino Real.

Okay. Go ahead and make those changes. I don't live in New York, so you do what you think is best.