Dezza's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 172121938 | 3 months ago | Awesome, thank you :) |
| 172121938 | 3 months ago | Hello! Thanks for updating the details on schools in Lancashire! Did you mean to put the check_date further back than it already was on Ellel St Johns School? way/454054893 |
| 170833961 | 4 months ago | Looks good, thanks |
| 170833961 | 4 months ago | Hello! Are you sure about the tagging on the residential paths on Craven Court? The ones marked access=private or access=destination will be privately owned, and those owners may well permit cycling. :) |
| 170434293 | 4 months ago | Hi Gorger, sorry for the delay - I've been away. I'm not sure I agree that it is street-side parking. There's a not-great mapillary image here https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/dezza?lat=54.053369355488&lng=-2.8008641940067&z=17&pKey=1443301276937769&focus=photo&x=0.19849821746880958&y=0.5797765189655096&zoom=1.235774252825336 - it's just a large area of gravel used as parking. I agree from reading around that parking aisle was incorrect. My suggestion would be to leave as-is now, but I welcome guidance from a more seasoned mapper! :-) |
| 170434293 | 4 months ago | Hello! Thank you got fixing this.
|
| 170355714 | 4 months ago | D'oh! Thank you :) |
| 170331229 | 4 months ago | Thank you! |
| 170175876 | 4 months ago | So there's an interesting quirk on this 1890 map - https://maps.nls.uk/view/229946781 with "Back Cable Street" appearing behind buildings on "Parliament Street" on what is now the car park for the Parliament Street Retail Park. That aside, all the other evidence I have is that Parliament Street runs as far as the North Road junction on both sides. The key point is this bus lane order from 2019 - https://council.lancashire.gov.uk/documents/s155424/Appendix%20A.pdf
Updated in changeset/170353883 |
| 170175876 | 4 months ago | Updated the crossings in changeset/170352860
|
| 170175876 | 4 months ago | I guess there's also the unmarked crossing of Greyhound Bridge Road to the NW of the lights. Is that fundamentally different to the crossing across NE-bound Parliament Street? The only difference is that there are 2 phases when a pedestrian can cross here without conflict |
| 170175876 | 4 months ago | Hello, I've just been re-reading the wiki and yes I think you might be right, although there is some extra nuance here. Mapillary image here -
Interestingly the crossing is only marked on the exit from Parliament Street, and not the entrance (i.e. only across the bus lane). I think this may be because it is only this half that has a phase where the pedestrians can cross (to the island) while protected by lights. There are (from memory) 3 phases at these lights.
All of these phases permit traffic to enter Parliament Street and conflict with pedestrians crossing - probably the reason for no markings on the NE-bound lane, and no signals. Does that change how we tag it? Example 5 on the wiki certainly fits for the bus-lane. But the general traffic lane in the opposite direction is possibly just a standard unmarked crossing like you would get at any uncontrolled junction. However is that any different to example 5? Presumably there traffic can still turn into the junction and conflict with pedestrians - just have to give them priority? As an aside, I think the labelling of Cable Street vs Parliament street is wrong - I think the area NE of the junction is all Parliament Street (you can see the sign on the mapillary image on the left hand wall under the green arrow), on the other side we can't use them as a source but MARIO and Google Maps both agree on a name while OSM has one side Cable Street and the other side Parliament Street! My suggestion would be to tag as per your suggestion for the bus-lane side, but the other side I'm less sure. I don't object to apply your suggestions to both sides (possibly with different crossing:markings=*). How does that sound? |
| 169860609 | 5 months ago | Note - these positions may not be 100% accurate, but more of an aid to future mappers for the street numbering. Interpolation will be needed for the intermediate houses. |
| 169057122 | 5 months ago | Hello! No. I meant to check on it when I got home actually as I thought I'd already numbered it the other day. I've tagged it as nohousenumber=yes and kept addr:flats - hopefully that keeps Street Complete happy! Thanks for the reminder! |
| 167108500 | 7 months ago | Thanks :)
|
| 146376176 | 7 months ago | Hello! Thanks for letting me know! Fixed in changeset/167020706 |
| 165998072 | 8 months ago | Thanks for updating the tagging! |
| 164253996 | 9 months ago | Nope! Thanks for flagging.
|
| 160068625 | 12 months ago | I've split these into individual hoops in changeset/160790569. I can't find the location of the 7th from my photos though. |
| 160068625 | about 1 year ago | Hey, I was the one who added this.
|