OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
181543891

Thanks, I should have added it earlier! I think you just updated the description though, so I added it in changeset/181545900

180887643

Thank you! I've made some tweaks in changeset/180967220 to reflect that, but feel free to amend further if that's not right!

180887643

Welcome to OSM, and thank you for adding the house number here. Are you familiar with the area?
I surveyed there a month or two back, but wasn't sure if that building (numbers 6/7) was apartments or not as there was a wide open garage at the bottom. Would you describe it as just two single-family homes, split down the middle, or is it divided further?
Thanks!

180615663

Looks like the original was missing a digit, but that is from a source that we can't use on OSM. I've added a note to resurvey the phone number in person.

180615663

Are you sure?

The Lancaster area code is +44 1524. +44 151 is a Liverpool area code.

179413053

JOSM has a plugin "Urban Eye 3D" which lets you visualise the building before committing. That of course means getting to know JOSM first though!
F4 is good, but sometimes takes a day or two to update.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/179413053

178994522

Interestingly, the old 50mph limit signs have not been removed adjacent to Galgate Bridge, so there is a different speed limit going north than the limit going south. I've left the lower limit in place, as I suspect the old signs will be removed in the near future.

178331911

Awesome, thank you

178331911

Hello, if I'm reading this change right, I think this change removes the ability to turn right from Broadway onto Marine Road East. Is that intentional?

PS Thanks for all the updates you've been doing around Morecambe recently :)

177945643

What was the source you used to confirm the correct house numbers?

177499114

Hello, thank you for adding UPRNs around Lancaster.
I've not had time to inspect every modification, but there's a few that have stood out as suspicious - are you sure they're correct?
Several patches of canal are tagged with a UPRN - should these maybe be the bridge or the road that's tagged? -
way/1083199517
way/1054546554
way/642117631
On this one - maybe the tag would go better on the school site, rather than an individual building?
way/385398584
I welcome your thoughts on these

176458740

Thanks, I forgot I needed to come back to this one!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/176458740

172121938

Awesome, thank you :)

172121938

Hello! Thanks for updating the details on schools in Lancashire!

Did you mean to put the check_date further back than it already was on Ellel St Johns School? way/454054893

170833961

Looks good, thanks

170833961

Hello!

Are you sure about the tagging on the residential paths on Craven Court? The ones marked access=private or access=destination will be privately owned, and those owners may well permit cycling. :)

170434293

Hi Gorger, sorry for the delay - I've been away.

I'm not sure I agree that it is street-side parking. There's a not-great mapillary image here https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/dezza?lat=54.053369355488&lng=-2.8008641940067&z=17&pKey=1443301276937769&focus=photo&x=0.19849821746880958&y=0.5797765189655096&zoom=1.235774252825336 - it's just a large area of gravel used as parking. I agree from reading around that parking aisle was incorrect.

My suggestion would be to leave as-is now, but I welcome guidance from a more seasoned mapper! :-)

170434293

Hello! Thank you got fixing this.
Are you able to confirm exactly what was incorrect about the junction? Is it that there shouldn't have been a highway into the parking area?

170355714

D'oh! Thank you :)

170331229

Thank you!